PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQJ vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQJ vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQJ achieves a 21.16% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 12.23% return.


QQQJ

1D
-1.07%
1M
0.90%
6M
14.19%
YTD
21.16%
1Y
38.78%
3Y*
19.75%
5Y*
6.73%
10Y*

DGRO

1D
0.19%
1M
2.16%
6M
9.63%
YTD
12.23%
1Y
21.63%
3Y*
16.92%
5Y*
11.06%
10Y*
13.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQJ vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QQQJ
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF
21.16%20.44%15.36%13.68%-28.25%9.76%15.34%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
12.23%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%7.99%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQJ and DGRO is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020

0.70

The correlation between QQQJ and DGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QQQJ vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQQJ
DGRO

Technology

40.4%
22.0%

Healthcare

18.7%
16.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%
5.4%

Industrials

11.1%
10.4%

Communication Services

7.8%
0.1%

Basic Materials

2.6%
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
11.1%

Utilities

2.6%
6.4%

Financial Services

2.0%
20.6%

Energy

1.0%
5.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

QQQJ
40.4%
DGRO
22.0%

Healthcare

QQQJ
18.7%
DGRO
16.5%

Consumer Cyclical

QQQJ
11.3%
DGRO
5.4%

Industrials

QQQJ
11.1%
DGRO
10.4%

Communication Services

QQQJ
7.8%
DGRO
0.1%

Basic Materials

QQQJ
2.6%
DGRO
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

QQQJ
2.6%
DGRO
11.1%

Utilities

QQQJ
2.6%
DGRO
6.4%

Financial Services

QQQJ
2.0%
DGRO
20.6%

Energy

QQQJ
1.0%
DGRO
5.1%

Real Estate

QQQJ

-

DGRO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQJ vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQJ
QQQJ Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
QQQJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQJ Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQJ vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQQJDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.42

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

3.36

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.55

12.98

+0.57

QQQJ vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQJ and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQJ vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQJ drawdown since its inception was -39.57%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQJ and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQJDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.57%

-35.10%

-4.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.84%

-6.47%

-5.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.46%

-14.03%

-8.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.57%

-19.31%

-20.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.35%

-0.50%

-1.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.49%

-3.42%

-12.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

1.67%

+1.20%

Volatility

QQQJ vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) has a higher volatility of 5.19% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.52%. This indicates that QQQJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQJDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.19%

2.52%

+2.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.53%

6.94%

+8.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.11%

9.50%

+9.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.19%

13.79%

+8.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.05%

16.57%

+5.48%

QQQJ vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQJ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QQQJ vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

QQQJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than DGRO's 1.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.91%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
QQQJ
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF
0.55%0.85%0.77%0.67%0.76%0.91%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQJ and DGRO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQJ has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to DGRO (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQJ dropped -39.57% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 5-year performance, DGRO leads with 11.06% vs 6.73% for QQQJ. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 11.06% return vs 6.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QQQJ.

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 0.55% for QQQJ.

QQQJ is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. QQQJ tracks NASDAQ Next Generation 100 Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QQQJ and 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQJ and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer