QQQI vs. TDAQ

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF (TDAQ).

QQQI and TDAQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QQQI is an actively managed fund by Neos. It was launched on Jan 29, 2024. TDAQ is an actively managed fund by TappAlpha. It was launched on Sep 4, 2025.

Performance

QQQI vs. TDAQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF (TDAQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QQQI vs. TDAQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	-3.32%	6.27%
TDAQ TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF	-4.55%	8.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQI achieves a -3.32% return, which is significantly higher than TDAQ's -4.55% return.

QQQI

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: -2.23%
• YTD: -3.32%
• 6M: -1.12%
• 1Y: 20.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TDAQ

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: -3.06%
• YTD: -4.55%
• 6M: -1.56%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQI vs. TDAQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QQQI and TDAQ have an expense ratio of 0.68%.

QQQI

NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF

TDAQ

TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF

Return for Risk

QQQI vs. TDAQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQI

QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 62
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 63
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQI vs. TDAQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF (TDAQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQQI	TDAQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.64	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.88	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.37	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQQI	TDAQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.06	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.91	0.40	+0.51

Correlation

The correlation between QQQI and TDAQ is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

QQQI vs. TDAQ - Dividend Comparison

QQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.88%, more than TDAQ's 9.29% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	14.88%	13.82%	12.85%
TDAQ TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF	9.29%	4.32%	0.00%

Drawdowns

QQQI vs. TDAQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQI drawdown since its inception was -20.00%, which is greater than TDAQ's maximum drawdown of -11.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQI and TDAQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQI	TDAQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.00%	-11.31%	-8.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.59%	-7.06%	+1.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.32%	-2.64%	+0.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.57%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QQQI	TDAQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.04%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.22%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.71%	17.58%	+2.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.47%	17.58%	-0.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.47%	17.58%	-0.11%