QQQI vs. OMAH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos, while OMAH is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by VistaShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QQQI returned 30.41% vs 11.44% for OMAH. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQQI charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.

Performance

QQQI vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQI achieves a 13.43% return, which is significantly higher than OMAH's 4.56% return.

QQQI

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 6.91%
• YTD: 13.43%
• 6M: 12.92%
• 1Y: 30.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OMAH

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 4.56%
• 6M: 4.00%
• 1Y: 11.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQI vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	13.43%	19.31%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	4.56%	6.74%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQI and OMAH is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025	0.48

The correlation between QQQI and OMAH shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QQQI vs. OMAH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQQI	OMAH
Technology	53.3%	13.6%
Communication Services	15.7%	9.8%
Consumer Cyclical	12.1%	4.1%
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	16.2%
Healthcare	4.3%	7.0%
Industrials	3.3%	-
Utilities	1.5%	-
Basic Materials	1.2%	-
Energy	0.7%	10.5%
Financial Services	0.3%	38.9%
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

QQQI vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQI

QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 68
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 70
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 74

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 49
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 37
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQI vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQQI	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	1.43	+0.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.12	2.02	+1.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.25	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.18	3.82	-0.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.27	9.48	+4.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QQQI vs. OMAH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQI Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is higher than the OMAH Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQI and OMAH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQQI	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.35	1.43	+0.93
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.34	0.70	+0.63

Drawdowns

QQQI vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQI drawdown since its inception was -20.00%, which is greater than OMAH's maximum drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQI and OMAH.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQI	OMAH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.00%	-11.83%	-8.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.61%	-3.00%	-6.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.17%	-2.65%	+2.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.20%	-1.26%	-0.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.14%	1.21%	+0.93%

Volatility

QQQI vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison

NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) has a higher volatility of 2.68% compared to VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) at 1.93%. This indicates that QQQI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OMAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQI	OMAH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.68%	1.93%	+0.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.85%	5.49%	+4.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.98%	8.05%	+4.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.07%	13.21%	+3.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.07%	13.21%	+3.86%

QQQI vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQI vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

QQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.19%, less than OMAH's 15.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	15.44%	12.86%	0.00%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	13.19%	13.82%	12.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQI and OMAH in my portfolio?

QQQI and OMAH have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQQI or OMAH?

QQQI has higher volatility (2.68%) compared to OMAH (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQI dropped -20.00% vs OMAH's -11.83%.

Which ETF is better, QQQI or OMAH?

On 1-year performance, QQQI leads with 30.41% vs 11.44% for OMAH. On fees, QQQI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, OMAH has been the lower-risk option at 1.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQQI or OMAH?

Over the 1-year period, QQQI has performed better with a 30.41% return vs 11.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQI or OMAH?

QQQI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OMAH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQQI or OMAH?

OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 15.44%, compared with 13.19% for QQQI.

What is the main difference between QQQI and OMAH?

QQQI is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while OMAH is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Neos and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for QQQI and 0.95% for OMAH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.