QQQI vs. OMAH

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH).

QQQI and OMAH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QQQI is an actively managed fund by Neos. It was launched on Jan 29, 2024. OMAH is an actively managed fund by VistaShares. It was launched on Mar 4, 2025.

Performance

QQQI vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QQQI vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	-3.32%	19.31%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	-0.14%	6.74%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQI achieves a -3.32% return, which is significantly lower than OMAH's -0.14% return.

QQQI

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: -2.23%
• YTD: -3.32%
• 6M: -1.12%
• 1Y: 20.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OMAH

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: -0.14%
• 6M: 1.24%
• 1Y: 5.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQI vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.

OMAH

VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF

QQQI

NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF

Return for Risk

QQQI vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQI

QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 62
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 63
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 70

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 24
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 25
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQI vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQQI	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	0.43	+0.63
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.64	0.70	+0.95
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.11	+0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.88	0.55	+1.33
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.37	2.94	+5.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QQQI vs. OMAH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQI Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is higher than the OMAH Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQI and OMAH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQQI	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.06	0.43	+0.63
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.91	0.44	+0.47

Correlation

The correlation between QQQI and OMAH is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

QQQI vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

QQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.88%, less than OMAH's 15.81% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	14.88%	13.82%	12.85%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	15.81%	12.86%	0.00%

Drawdowns

QQQI vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQI drawdown since its inception was -20.00%, which is greater than OMAH's maximum drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQI and OMAH.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQI	OMAH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.00%	-11.83%	-8.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.61%	-7.78%	-1.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.59%	-1.71%	-3.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.32%	-1.40%	-0.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.57%	2.09%	+0.48%

Volatility

QQQI vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison

NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) at 1.92%. This indicates that QQQI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OMAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQI	OMAH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.04%	1.92%	+4.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.22%	6.32%	+4.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.71%	13.93%	+5.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.47%	13.95%	+3.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.47%	13.95%	+3.52%