PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OMAH vs. BRK-B
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OMAH vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OMAH achieves a 5.24% return, which is significantly higher than BRK-B's -2.95% return.


OMAH

1D
-0.38%
1M
-1.54%
YTD
5.24%
6M
4.79%
1Y
11.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BRK-B

1D
-1.41%
1M
0.87%
YTD
-2.95%
6M
-2.70%
1Y
0.33%
3Y*
13.44%
5Y*
11.87%
10Y*
13.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OMAH vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between OMAH and BRK-B is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2025

0.57

The correlation between OMAH and BRK-B has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OMAH vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OMAH
OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

BRK-B
BRK-B Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
BRK-B Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRK-B Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRK-B Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
BRK-B Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRK-B Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OMAH vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OMAHBRK-BDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.02

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.78

0.04

+3.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.91

0.07

+8.84

OMAH vs. BRK-B - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OMAH Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is higher than the BRK-B Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OMAH and BRK-B, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OMAH vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OMAH drawdown since its inception was -11.83%, smaller than the maximum BRK-B drawdown of -53.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMAH and BRK-B.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OMAHBRK-BDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.83%

-53.86%

+42.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.00%

-9.42%

+6.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.02%

-9.63%

+7.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.27%

-11.07%

+9.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.27%

4.51%

-3.24%

Volatility

OMAH vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) is 2.21%, while Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) has a volatility of 3.80%. This indicates that OMAH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OMAHBRK-BDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.21%

3.80%

-1.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.59%

10.53%

-4.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.03%

14.40%

-6.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.99%

17.10%

-4.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.99%

19.39%

-6.40%

Dividends

OMAH vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison

OMAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.06%, while BRK-B has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


OMAH and BRK-B have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRK-B has higher volatility (3.80%) compared to OMAH (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OMAH dropped -11.83% vs BRK-B's -53.86%.

OMAH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OMAH and BRK-B

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer