OMAH vs. BRK-B
OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by VistaShares, while BRK-B (Berkshire Hathaway Inc.) is a stock. Over the past year, OMAH returned 12.34% vs -2.52% for BRK-B. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
OMAH vs. BRK-B - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OMAH achieves a 5.13% return, which is significantly higher than BRK-B's -4.78% return.
OMAH
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 5.13%
- 6M
- 5.28%
- 1Y
- 12.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BRK-B
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 2.82%
- YTD
- -4.78%
- 6M
- -4.89%
- 1Y
- -2.52%
- 3Y*
- 13.36%
- 5Y*
- 10.35%
- 10Y*
- 12.93%
OMAH vs. BRK-B - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF | 5.13% | 6.74% |
BRK-B Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | -4.78% | 0.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between OMAH and BRK-B is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025 | 0.56 |
The correlation between OMAH and BRK-B has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OMAH vs. BRK-B — Risk / Return Rank
OMAH
BRK-B
OMAH vs. BRK-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OMAH | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 0.98 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.12 | -0.27 | +4.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.16 | -0.57 | +10.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OMAH | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54 | -0.18 | +1.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.67 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.48 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
OMAH vs. BRK-B - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OMAH drawdown since its inception was -11.83%, smaller than the maximum BRK-B drawdown of -53.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OMAH and BRK-B.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OMAH | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.83% | -53.86% | +42.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.00% | -9.42% | +6.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.12% | -11.33% | +9.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.26% | -11.07% | +9.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.22% | 4.46% | -3.24% |
Volatility
OMAH vs. BRK-B - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) is 1.99%, while Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) has a volatility of 3.72%. This indicates that OMAH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRK-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OMAH | BRK-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.99% | 3.72% | -1.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.50% | 10.70% | -5.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.06% | 14.32% | -6.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.20% | 17.11% | -3.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.20% | 19.43% | -6.23% |
Dividends
OMAH vs. BRK-B - Dividend Comparison
OMAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.36%, while BRK-B has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BRK-B Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF | 15.36% | 12.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OMAH and BRK-B have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BRK-B has higher volatility (3.72%) compared to OMAH (1.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OMAH dropped -11.83% vs BRK-B's -53.86%.
OMAH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OMAH and BRK-B
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer