QQQI vs. MU
QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos, while MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past year, QQQI returned 19.87% vs 758.76% for MU. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
QQQI vs. MU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQI achieves a 10.04% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 240.34% return.
QQQI
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- -2.68%
- 6M
- 10.99%
- YTD
- 10.04%
- 1Y
- 19.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 19.68%
MU
- 1D
- 12.17%
- 1M
- -14.38%
- 6M
- 166.13%
- YTD
- 240.34%
- 1Y
- 758.76%
- 3Y*
- 146.36%
- 5Y*
- 67.49%
- 10Y*
- 54.16%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.59%
QQQI vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 10.04% | 18.62% | 19.44% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 240.34% | 240.24% | -5.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQI and MU is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024 | 0.64 |
The correlation between QQQI and MU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQI vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank
QQQI
MU
QQQI vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQQI | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -8.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.70 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 25.31 | -23.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.34 | 84.73 | -76.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQQI vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQI drawdown since its inception was -20.00%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQI and MU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQI | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.00% | -98.25% | +78.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.61% | -30.28% | +20.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -57.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -57.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.16% | -19.99% | +16.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.22% | -58.05% | +55.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.39% | 9.03% | -6.64% |
Volatility
QQQI vs. MU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) is 6.40%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 32.09%. This indicates that QQQI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQI | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.40% | 32.09% | -25.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.06% | 63.69% | -50.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.68% | 77.22% | -61.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.62% | 55.26% | -37.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.62% | 50.92% | -33.30% |
Dividends
QQQI vs. MU - Dividend Comparison
QQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.81%, more than MU's 0.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 13.81% | 13.82% | 12.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQI and MU have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (32.09%) compared to QQQI (6.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQI dropped -20.00% vs MU's -98.25%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.93 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQI and MU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer