PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQI vs. MLPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQI vs. MLPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQI achieves a 11.18% return, which is significantly lower than MLPI's 16.44% return.


QQQI

1D
2.45%
1M
0.80%
6M
10.57%
YTD
11.18%
1Y
20.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.84%

MLPI

1D
-1.18%
1M
-1.50%
6M
9.25%
YTD
16.44%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$23.58M$22.61M$19.60M
$332.84M$328.69M$357.78M

QQQI vs. MLPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QQQI and MLPI is -0.24, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025

-0.24

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQI vs. MLPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QQQI
QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

MLPI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QQQI vs. MLPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF (MLPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQQIMLPIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.74

QQQI vs. MLPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQI vs. MLPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQI drawdown since its inception was -20.00%, which is greater than MLPI's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQI and MLPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQIMLPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.00%

-5.38%

-14.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.16%

-4.77%

+2.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.28%

-1.67%

-0.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

Volatility

QQQI vs. MLPI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQIMLPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.49%

13.34%

+3.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.81%

13.34%

+4.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.81%

13.34%

+4.47%

QQQI vs. MLPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QQQI and MLPI have an expense ratio of 0.68%.


Dividends

QQQI vs. MLPI - Dividend Comparison

QQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.82%, more than MLPI's 8.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
MLPI
NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF
8.76%0.00%0.00%
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
13.82%13.82%12.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQI and MLPI have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.68% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQQI and MLPI have the same expense ratio: 0.68% per year.

QQQI has the higher dividend yield at 13.82%, compared with 8.76% for MLPI.

QQQI is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while MLPI is Infrastructure Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQI and MLPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer