QQQI vs. FOF
QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) and FOF (Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund) are both funds - QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos, while FOF is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Cohen & Steers. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QQQI returned 27.00% vs 17.62% for FOF. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQQI charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FOF.
Performance
QQQI vs. FOF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQI achieves a 10.58% return, which is significantly higher than FOF's 5.89% return.
QQQI
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -0.22%
- YTD
- 10.58%
- 6M
- 11.20%
- 1Y
- 27.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FOF
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- -1.20%
- YTD
- 5.89%
- 6M
- 7.91%
- 1Y
- 17.62%
- 3Y*
- 17.25%
- 5Y*
- 7.55%
- 10Y*
- 10.81%
QQQI vs. FOF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 10.58% | 18.62% | 19.44% |
FOF Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund | 5.89% | 13.01% | 18.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQI and FOF is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024 | 0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQI vs. FOF — Risk / Return Rank
QQQI
FOF
QQQI vs. FOF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund (FOF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQQI | FOF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.24 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 1.17 | +1.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.63 | 3.85 | +7.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQQI vs. FOF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQI drawdown since its inception was -20.00%, smaller than the maximum FOF drawdown of -59.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQI and FOF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQI | FOF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.00% | -59.38% | +39.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.61% | -15.07% | +5.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.69% | -7.54% | +4.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.21% | -9.35% | +7.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 4.56% | -2.33% |
Volatility
QQQI vs. FOF - Volatility Comparison
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) has a higher volatility of 6.10% compared to Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund (FOF) at 4.58%. This indicates that QQQI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FOF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQI | FOF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.10% | 4.58% | +1.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.35% | 12.28% | -0.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.10% | 13.74% | +0.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.34% | 18.04% | -0.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.34% | 20.33% | -2.99% |
QQQI vs. FOF - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than FOF's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQI vs. FOF - Dividend Comparison
QQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.53%, more than FOF's 7.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOF Cohen & Steers Closed-End Opportunity Fund | 7.76% | 7.91% | 8.22% | 9.32% | 9.99% | 7.06% | 8.41% | 7.78% | 9.41% | 7.84% | 8.90% | 9.49% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 13.53% | 13.82% | 12.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQI and FOF have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQI has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to FOF (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQI dropped -20.00% vs FOF's -59.38%.
QQQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQI and FOF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer