QQQI vs. EINC

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. QQQI is actively managed, while EINC is passively managed. Over the past year, QQQI returned 20.70% vs 27.87% for EINC. Their 0.12 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. QQQI charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for EINC.

Performance

QQQI vs. EINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQI achieves a 11.18% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 26.81% return.

QQQI

• 1D: 2.45%
• 1M: 0.80%
• 6M: 10.57%
• YTD: 11.18%
• 1Y: 20.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.84%

EINC

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: 2.25%
• 6M: 17.08%
• YTD: 26.81%
• 1Y: 27.87%
• 3Y*: 27.29%
• 5Y*: 22.67%
• 10Y*: 11.23%
• ALL TIME*: 0.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF	$754.80K	$2.71M	$2.24M
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	$332.84M	$328.69M	$357.78M

QQQI vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	11.18%	18.62%	19.44%
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF	26.81%	7.11%	40.29%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQI and EINC is -0.19, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024	0.12

The correlation between QQQI and EINC shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QQQI vs. EINC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQQI	EINC
Technology	59.9%	-
Communication Services	12.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	6.5%	-
Industrials	4.3%	0.6%
Healthcare	3.7%	-
Utilities	1.2%	0.5%
Basic Materials	1.1%	-
Energy	0.5%	99.5%
Financial Services	0.2%	-
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

QQQI vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QQQI

QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 49
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 44
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 58

EINC

EINC Risk / Return Rank: 70
EINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
EINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
EINC Omega Ratio Rank: 66
EINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
EINC Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QQQI vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQQI	EINC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.27	1.81	-0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.78	2.49	-0.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.32	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.16	3.55	-1.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.74	8.67	-0.94

QQQI vs. EINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQI Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is lower than the EINC Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQI and EINC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQQI vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQI drawdown since its inception was -20.00%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQI and EINC.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQI	EINC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.00%	-87.55%	+67.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.61%	-7.89%	-1.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.01%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.87%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-68.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.16%	-3.86%	+1.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.28%	-43.82%	+41.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.68%	3.24%	-0.56%

Volatility

QQQI vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison

NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) has a higher volatility of 6.94% compared to VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) at 5.71%. This indicates that QQQI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQI	EINC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.94%	5.71%	+1.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.90%	12.53%	+1.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.49%	15.45%	+1.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.81%	19.49%	-1.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.81%	25.33%	-7.52%

QQQI vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than EINC's 0.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQI vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison

QQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.82%, more than EINC's 4.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF	4.24%	4.51%	3.33%	3.77%	2.89%	6.03%	6.69%	9.66%	11.31%	8.53%	9.71%	28.53%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	13.82%	13.82%	12.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQI and EINC in my portfolio?

QQQI and EINC have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQQI or EINC?

QQQI has higher volatility (6.94%) compared to EINC (5.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQI dropped -20.00% vs EINC's -87.55%.

Which ETF is better, QQQI or EINC?

On 1-year performance, EINC leads with 27.87% vs 20.70% for QQQI. On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, EINC has been the lower-risk option at 5.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQQI or EINC?

Over the 1-year period, EINC has performed better with a 27.87% return vs 20.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQI or EINC?

EINC is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for QQQI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQQI or EINC?

QQQI has the higher dividend yield at 13.82%, compared with 4.24% for EINC.

What is the main difference between QQQI and EINC?

QQQI is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while EINC is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Neos and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for QQQI and 0.46% for EINC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.