PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQI vs. EIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQI vs. EIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and Eagle Point Income Company Inc. (EIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQI achieves a 10.58% return, which is significantly higher than EIC's -2.60% return.


QQQI

1D
0.70%
1M
0.26%
YTD
10.58%
6M
11.20%
1Y
25.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EIC

1D
-0.68%
1M
-2.22%
YTD
-2.60%
6M
1.58%
1Y
-10.02%
3Y*
6.21%
5Y*
4.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQI vs. EIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
10.58%18.62%19.44%
EIC
Eagle Point Income Company Inc.
-2.60%-15.28%16.08%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQI and EIC is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQI vs. EIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQI
QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

EIC
EIC Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
EIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIC Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
EIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIC Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQI vs. EIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and Eagle Point Income Company Inc. (EIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQQIEICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

0.93

+0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

-0.35

+3.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.63

-0.65

+12.27

QQQI vs. EIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQI Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the EIC Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQI and EIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQI vs. EIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQI drawdown since its inception was -20.00%, smaller than the maximum EIC drawdown of -67.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQI and EIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQIEICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.00%

-67.08%

+47.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.61%

-28.67%

+19.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.69%

-22.93%

+20.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.21%

-12.30%

+10.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

15.54%

-13.31%

Volatility

QQQI vs. EIC - Volatility Comparison

NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) has a higher volatility of 6.10% compared to Eagle Point Income Company Inc. (EIC) at 4.34%. This indicates that QQQI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQIEICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.10%

4.34%

+1.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.35%

13.89%

-2.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.10%

19.68%

-5.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.34%

20.20%

-2.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.34%

37.40%

-20.06%

Dividends

QQQI vs. EIC - Dividend Comparison

QQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.53%, less than EIC's 16.86% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
EIC
Eagle Point Income Company Inc.
16.86%17.35%15.44%13.59%11.03%7.78%10.39%3.65%
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
13.53%13.82%12.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQI and EIC have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQI has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to EIC (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQI dropped -20.00% vs EIC's -67.08%.

QQQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQI and EIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer