EIC vs. CLOZ
EIC (Eagle Point Income Company Inc.) is a stock, while CLOZ (Panagram BBB-B CLO ETF) is CLO fund actively managed by Panagram. Over the past 3 years, EIC returned 6.16%/yr vs 9.99%/yr for CLOZ. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EIC vs. CLOZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EIC achieves a -5.20% return, which is significantly lower than CLOZ's 2.26% return.
EIC
- 1D
- -2.18%
- 1M
- -3.84%
- YTD
- -5.20%
- 6M
- -5.94%
- 1Y
- -14.05%
- 3Y*
- 6.16%
- 5Y*
- 4.13%
- 10Y*
- —
CLOZ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- YTD
- 2.26%
- 6M
- 2.50%
- 1Y
- 5.55%
- 3Y*
- 9.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EIC vs. CLOZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EIC Eagle Point Income Company Inc. | -5.20% | -15.28% | 24.02% | 13.92% |
CLOZ Panagram BBB-B CLO ETF | 2.26% | 5.99% | 11.85% | 14.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between EIC and CLOZ is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2023 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EIC vs. CLOZ — Risk / Return Rank
EIC
CLOZ
EIC vs. CLOZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eagle Point Income Company Inc. (EIC) and Panagram BBB-B CLO ETF (CLOZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EIC | CLOZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.40 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 1.43 | -1.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.89 | 4.74 | -5.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EIC vs. CLOZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EIC drawdown since its inception was -67.08%, which is greater than CLOZ's maximum drawdown of -5.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EIC and CLOZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EIC | CLOZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.08% | -5.32% | -61.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.67% | -3.90% | -24.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.06% | -5.32% | -28.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.98% | -0.38% | -24.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.33% | -0.38% | -11.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.73% | 1.17% | +14.56% |
Volatility
EIC vs. CLOZ - Volatility Comparison
Eagle Point Income Company Inc. (EIC) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to Panagram BBB-B CLO ETF (CLOZ) at 0.66%. This indicates that EIC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EIC | CLOZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.72% | 0.66% | +4.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.21% | 3.17% | +11.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.96% | 3.47% | +16.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.27% | 3.79% | +16.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.37% | 3.79% | +33.58% |
Dividends
EIC vs. CLOZ - Dividend Comparison
EIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.32%, more than CLOZ's 7.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLOZ Panagram BBB-B CLO ETF | 7.41% | 7.63% | 9.09% | 8.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EIC Eagle Point Income Company Inc. | 17.32% | 17.35% | 15.44% | 13.59% | 11.03% | 7.78% | 10.39% | 3.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EIC and CLOZ have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EIC has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to CLOZ (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EIC dropped -67.08% vs CLOZ's -5.32%.
CLOZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EIC and CLOZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer