PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQH vs. OVLH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQH vs. OVLH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) and Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF (OVLH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQH achieves a 7.91% return, which is significantly higher than OVLH's 7.26% return.


QQQH

1D
-0.02%
1M
4.93%
YTD
7.91%
6M
7.82%
1Y
20.09%
3Y*
20.71%
5Y*
9.42%
10Y*

OVLH

1D
-0.57%
1M
3.78%
YTD
7.26%
6M
6.86%
1Y
18.57%
3Y*
16.81%
5Y*
9.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQH vs. OVLH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QQQH
NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF
7.91%14.17%25.98%30.96%-28.35%9.57%
OVLH
Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF
7.26%15.77%18.44%16.93%-16.16%20.91%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQH and OVLH is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2021

0.84

The correlation between QQQH and OVLH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQQH vs. OVLH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQQH
OVLH

Technology

53.5%
35.7%

Communication Services

16.1%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

12.1%
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

7.6%
4.9%

Healthcare

4.1%
8.5%

Industrials

3.1%
8.3%

Utilities

1.3%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.2%
1.8%

Energy

0.6%
3.5%

Financial Services

0.2%
11.6%

Real Estate

0.1%
1.9%

Technology

QQQH
53.5%
OVLH
35.7%

Communication Services

QQQH
16.1%
OVLH
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

QQQH
12.1%
OVLH
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

QQQH
7.6%
OVLH
4.9%

Healthcare

QQQH
4.1%
OVLH
8.5%

Industrials

QQQH
3.1%
OVLH
8.3%

Utilities

QQQH
1.3%
OVLH
2.4%

Basic Materials

QQQH
1.2%
OVLH
1.8%

Energy

QQQH
0.6%
OVLH
3.5%

Financial Services

QQQH
0.2%
OVLH
11.6%

Real Estate

QQQH
0.1%
OVLH
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQH vs. OVLH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQH
QQQH Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
QQQH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQH Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQH Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

OVLH
OVLH Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
OVLH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OVLH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
OVLH Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
OVLH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
OVLH Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQH vs. OVLH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) and Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF (OVLH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQHOVLHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.39

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

2.93

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.60

12.05

+0.55

QQQH vs. OVLH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQH Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the OVLH Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQH and OVLH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQHOVLHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

2.21

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.83

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.93

-0.14

Drawdowns

QQQH vs. OVLH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQH drawdown since its inception was -31.24%, which is greater than OVLH's maximum drawdown of -20.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQH and OVLH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQHOVLHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.24%

-20.69%

-10.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.96%

-6.36%

-0.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.18%

-9.57%

-5.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.24%

-20.69%

-10.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-0.57%

+0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.27%

-5.02%

-3.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

1.54%

+0.06%

Volatility

QQQH vs. OVLH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) is 1.73%, while Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF (OVLH) has a volatility of 2.27%. This indicates that QQQH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OVLH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQHOVLHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.73%

2.27%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.34%

6.21%

+1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.67%

8.46%

+1.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.20%

11.71%

+1.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.37%

11.79%

+1.58%

QQQH vs. OVLH - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQH has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than OVLH's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQH vs. OVLH - Dividend Comparison

QQQH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.74%, more than OVLH's 0.28% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
OVLH
Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF
0.28%0.30%0.32%0.83%0.79%0.40%0.00%0.00%
QQQH
NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF
8.74%8.86%7.53%7.18%9.05%7.77%7.48%0.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQH and OVLH have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OVLH has higher volatility (2.27%) compared to QQQH (1.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQH dropped -31.24% vs OVLH's -20.69%.

On 5-year performance, OVLH leads with 9.69% vs 9.42% for QQQH. On fees, QQQH is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, QQQH has been the lower-risk option at 1.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, OVLH has performed better with a 9.69% return vs 9.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQH is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for OVLH.

QQQH has the higher dividend yield at 8.74%, compared with 0.28% for OVLH.

QQQH is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while OVLH is Equity Hedged. They also come from different issuers: Neos and Liquid Strategies. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for QQQH and 0.80% for OVLH.

OVLH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQH and OVLH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer