PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OVLH vs. QQHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OVLH vs. QQHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF (OVLH) and Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OVLH achieves a 4.90% return, which is significantly lower than QQHG's 9.06% return.


OVLH

1D
-0.97%
1M
-1.38%
YTD
4.90%
6M
4.28%
1Y
15.28%
3Y*
15.44%
5Y*
9.11%
10Y*

QQHG

1D
-1.42%
1M
0.11%
YTD
9.06%
6M
8.23%
1Y
23.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OVLH vs. QQHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between OVLH and QQHG is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2025

0.91

The correlation between OVLH and QQHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OVLH vs. QQHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OVLH
OVLH Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
OVLH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OVLH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
OVLH Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
OVLH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
OVLH Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

QQHG
QQHG Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
QQHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQHG Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
QQHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQHG Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OVLH vs. QQHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF (OVLH) and Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OVLHQQHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.42

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

3.80

-1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.50

14.35

-4.85

OVLH vs. QQHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OVLH Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the QQHG Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OVLH and QQHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OVLH vs. QQHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OVLH drawdown since its inception was -20.69%, which is greater than QQHG's maximum drawdown of -6.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OVLH and QQHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OVLHQQHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.69%

-6.18%

-14.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.36%

-6.18%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.75%

-2.38%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.99%

-1.02%

-3.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

1.63%

-0.02%

Volatility

OVLH vs. QQHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF (OVLH) is 3.54%, while Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) has a volatility of 4.47%. This indicates that OVLH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OVLHQQHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

4.47%

-0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.89%

7.64%

-0.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.96%

10.16%

-1.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.78%

10.11%

+1.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.83%

10.11%

+1.72%

OVLH vs. QQHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

OVLH has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than QQHG's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

OVLH vs. QQHG - Dividend Comparison

OVLH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, more than QQHG's 0.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
OVLH
Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF
0.29%0.30%0.32%0.83%0.79%0.40%
QQHG
Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF
0.26%0.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, OVLH and QQHG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QQHG has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to OVLH (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OVLH dropped -20.69% vs QQHG's -6.18%.

On 1-year performance, QQHG leads with 23.40% vs 15.28% for OVLH. On fees, QQHG is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, OVLH has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQHG has performed better with a 23.40% return vs 15.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQHG is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for OVLH.

OVLH has the higher dividend yield at 0.29%, compared with 0.26% for QQHG.

They also come from different issuers: Liquid Strategies and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for OVLH and 0.45% for QQHG.

QQHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OVLH and QQHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer