PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OVLH vs. FHEQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OVLH vs. FHEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF (OVLH) and Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF (FHEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OVLH achieves a 5.93% return, which is significantly lower than FHEQ's 7.47% return.


OVLH

1D
-0.39%
1M
-0.41%
YTD
5.93%
6M
5.68%
1Y
17.12%
3Y*
15.81%
5Y*
9.41%
10Y*

FHEQ

1D
-0.27%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
7.47%
6M
7.05%
1Y
19.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OVLH vs. FHEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
OVLH
Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF
5.93%15.77%11.03%
FHEQ
Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF
7.47%13.34%11.10%

Correlation

The correlation between OVLH and FHEQ is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2024

0.95

The correlation between OVLH and FHEQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OVLH vs. FHEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OVLH
OVLH Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
OVLH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OVLH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
OVLH Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
OVLH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
OVLH Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FHEQ
FHEQ Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FHEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FHEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OVLH vs. FHEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF (OVLH) and Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF (FHEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OVLHFHEQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.35

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

2.50

+0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.71

9.81

+0.90

OVLH vs. FHEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OVLH Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the FHEQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OVLH and FHEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OVLH vs. FHEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OVLH drawdown since its inception was -20.69%, which is greater than FHEQ's maximum drawdown of -11.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OVLH and FHEQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OVLHFHEQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.69%

-11.12%

-9.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.36%

-7.77%

+1.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.80%

-1.71%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.99%

-1.82%

-3.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

1.98%

-0.38%

Volatility

OVLH vs. FHEQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF (OVLH) is 3.41%, while Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF (FHEQ) has a volatility of 3.85%. This indicates that OVLH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OVLHFHEQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.41%

3.85%

-0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.83%

7.36%

-0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.92%

9.93%

-1.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.77%

10.55%

+1.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.82%

10.55%

+1.27%

OVLH vs. FHEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

OVLH has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FHEQ's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

OVLH vs. FHEQ - Dividend Comparison

OVLH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than FHEQ's 0.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
FHEQ
Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF
0.55%0.63%0.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OVLH
Overlay Shares Hedged Large Cap Equity ETF
0.28%0.30%0.32%0.83%0.79%0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, OVLH and FHEQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FHEQ has higher volatility (3.85%) compared to OVLH (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OVLH dropped -20.69% vs FHEQ's -11.12%.

On 1-year performance, FHEQ leads with 19.37% vs 17.12% for OVLH. On fees, FHEQ is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, OVLH has been the lower-risk option at 3.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FHEQ has performed better with a 19.37% return vs 17.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FHEQ is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for OVLH.

FHEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.28% for OVLH.

They also come from different issuers: Liquid Strategies and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for OVLH and 0.48% for FHEQ.

FHEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OVLH and FHEQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer