PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQH vs. IYRI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQH vs. IYRI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) and NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF (IYRI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQH achieves a 4.35% return, which is significantly lower than IYRI's 7.03% return.


QQQH

1D
-1.18%
1M
-1.69%
YTD
4.35%
6M
3.42%
1Y
14.15%
3Y*
17.76%
5Y*
7.95%
10Y*

IYRI

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.79%
YTD
7.03%
6M
6.33%
1Y
8.76%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQH vs. IYRI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QQQH and IYRI is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2025

0.24

The correlation between QQQH and IYRI shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQH vs. IYRI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQH
QQQH Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
QQQH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQH Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQH Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

IYRI
IYRI Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
IYRI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYRI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYRI Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
IYRI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYRI Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQH vs. IYRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) and NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF (IYRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQQHIYRIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.15

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.04

1.17

+0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.47

4.20

+4.27

QQQH vs. IYRI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQH Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is higher than the IYRI Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQH and IYRI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQH vs. IYRI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQH drawdown since its inception was -31.24%, which is greater than IYRI's maximum drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQH and IYRI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQHIYRIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.24%

-12.12%

-19.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.96%

-7.53%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.32%

-0.56%

-2.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.21%

-1.69%

-6.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

2.10%

-0.43%

Volatility

QQQH vs. IYRI - Volatility Comparison

NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) has a higher volatility of 5.33% compared to NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF (IYRI) at 4.21%. This indicates that QQQH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYRI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQHIYRIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.33%

4.21%

+1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.63%

7.92%

+0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.78%

10.74%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.36%

13.18%

+0.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.46%

13.18%

+0.28%

QQQH vs. IYRI - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QQQH and IYRI have an expense ratio of 0.68%.


Dividends

QQQH vs. IYRI - Dividend Comparison

QQQH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.04%, less than IYRI's 11.97% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
IYRI
NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF
11.97%11.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQH
NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF
9.04%8.86%7.53%7.18%9.05%7.77%7.48%0.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQH and IYRI have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQH has higher volatility (5.33%) compared to IYRI (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQH dropped -31.24% vs IYRI's -12.12%.

On 1-year performance, QQQH leads with 14.15% vs 8.76% for IYRI. Both ETFs have the same 0.68% expense ratio. On volatility, IYRI has been the lower-risk option at 4.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQH has performed better with a 14.15% return vs 8.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQH and IYRI have the same expense ratio: 0.68% per year.

IYRI has the higher dividend yield at 11.97%, compared with 9.04% for QQQH.

QQQH is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while IYRI is Derivative Income.

QQQH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQH and IYRI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer