QQQG vs. QB

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

QQQG (Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF) and QB (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQG is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Pacer, while QB is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Nasdaq-100. QQQG is actively managed, while QB is passively managed. Over the past year, QQQG returned 36.61% vs 18.83% for QB. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQQG charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for QB.

Performance

QQQG vs. QB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQG achieves a 28.44% return, which is significantly higher than QB's 12.55% return.

QQQG

• 1D: -1.79%
• 1M: -4.99%
• 6M: 26.97%
• YTD: 28.44%
• 1Y: 36.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QB

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 2.30%
• 6M: 11.49%
• YTD: 12.55%
• 1Y: 18.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQG vs. QB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QQQG Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	28.44%	7.06%
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	12.55%	6.10%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQG and QB is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.77

The correlation between QQQG and QB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQQG vs. QB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQQG	QB
Technology	77.5%	49.9%
Healthcare	9.7%	5.3%
Consumer Cyclical	3.6%	12.5%
Industrials	3.1%	3.7%
Consumer Defensive	2.1%	8.6%
Energy	2.0%	0.6%
Communication Services	2.0%	16.4%
Basic Materials	-	1.3%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	1.6%

Return for Risk

QQQG vs. QB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQG

QQQG Risk / Return Rank: 59
QQQG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
QQQG Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
QQQG Omega Ratio Rank: 54
QQQG Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
QQQG Martin Ratio Rank: 63

QB

QB Risk / Return Rank: 94
QB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
QB Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
QB Omega Ratio Rank: 96
QB Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
QB Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQG vs. QB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQQG	QB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.56	2.69	-1.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.09	3.91	-1.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.64	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.67	5.44	-2.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.01	26.25	-17.25

QQQG vs. QB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQG Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is lower than the QB Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQG and QB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQQG vs. QB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQG drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, which is greater than QB's maximum drawdown of -3.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQG and QB.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQG	QB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.61%	-3.47%	-20.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.79%	-3.47%	-10.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.17%	-0.11%	-6.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.60%	-0.42%	-3.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.07%	0.72%	+3.35%

Volatility

QQQG vs. QB - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) has a higher volatility of 11.59% compared to ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB) at 2.87%. This indicates that QQQG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQG	QB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.59%	2.87%	+8.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.57%	5.83%	+14.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.56%	7.03%	+16.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.84%	6.92%	+17.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.84%	6.92%	+17.92%

QQQG vs. QB - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than QB's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQG vs. QB - Dividend Comparison

QQQG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than QB's 0.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
QB ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF	0.77%	0.48%	0.00%
QQQG Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	0.05%	0.06%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQG and QB in my portfolio?

QQQG and QB have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQQG or QB?

QQQG has higher volatility (11.59%) compared to QB (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQG dropped -23.61% vs QB's -3.47%.

Which ETF is better, QQQG or QB?

On 1-year performance, QQQG leads with 36.61% vs 18.83% for QB. On fees, QQQG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, QB has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQQG or QB?

Over the 1-year period, QQQG has performed better with a 36.61% return vs 18.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQG or QB?

QQQG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for QB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQQG or QB?

QB has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.05% for QQQG.

What is the main difference between QQQG and QB?

QQQG is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while QB is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QQQG and 0.58% for QB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.