PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQA vs. XOVR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQA vs. XOVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) and ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQA achieves a 65.37% return, which is significantly higher than XOVR's -0.35% return.


QQQA

1D
2.20%
1M
23.31%
YTD
65.37%
6M
67.98%
1Y
88.43%
3Y*
34.58%
5Y*
14.74%
10Y*

XOVR

1D
-1.67%
1M
6.93%
YTD
-0.35%
6M
0.55%
1Y
10.88%
3Y*
19.21%
5Y*
6.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQA vs. XOVR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QQQA
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
65.37%9.87%16.17%24.98%-29.08%8.43%
XOVR
ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF
-0.35%11.83%33.21%51.89%-41.09%4.15%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQA and XOVR is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2021

0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between QQQA and XOVR has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

QQQA vs. XOVR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQQA
XOVR

Technology

65.2%
34.1%

Communication Services

13.7%
26.7%

Energy

9.1%
3.1%

Healthcare

7.8%
18.4%

Consumer Cyclical

4.2%
6.9%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

8.5%

Industrials

-

5.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

QQQA
65.2%
XOVR
34.1%

Communication Services

QQQA
13.7%
XOVR
26.7%

Energy

QQQA
9.1%
XOVR
3.1%

Healthcare

QQQA
7.8%
XOVR
18.4%

Consumer Cyclical

QQQA
4.2%
XOVR
6.9%

Basic Materials

QQQA

-

XOVR

-

Consumer Defensive

QQQA

-

XOVR

-

Financial Services

QQQA

-

XOVR
8.5%

Industrials

QQQA

-

XOVR
5.4%

Real Estate

QQQA

-

XOVR

-

Utilities

QQQA

-

XOVR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQA vs. XOVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQA
QQQA Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
QQQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQA Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQA Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

XOVR
XOVR Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
XOVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOVR Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
XOVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOVR Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQA vs. XOVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) and ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQAXOVRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.11

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.11

0.45

+5.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.85

1.00

+21.85

QQQA vs. XOVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQA Sharpe Ratio is 3.41, which is higher than the XOVR Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQA and XOVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQAXOVRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.41

0.55

+2.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.24

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.39

+0.19

Drawdowns

QQQA vs. XOVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQA drawdown since its inception was -38.44%, smaller than the maximum XOVR drawdown of -56.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQA and XOVR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQAXOVRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.44%

-56.28%

+17.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.54%

-24.32%

+9.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.84%

-25.23%

-5.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.44%

-49.35%

+10.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-7.55%

+7.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.68%

-18.41%

+2.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.88%

10.94%

-7.06%

Volatility

QQQA vs. XOVR - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) has a higher volatility of 10.17% compared to ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) at 4.20%. This indicates that QQQA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XOVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQAXOVRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.17%

4.20%

+5.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.18%

14.81%

+7.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.05%

20.00%

+6.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.83%

26.15%

-0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.77%

26.87%

-1.10%

QQQA vs. XOVR - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQA has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than XOVR's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQA vs. XOVR - Dividend Comparison

QQQA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, while XOVR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
QQQA
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
0.06%0.10%0.09%0.34%0.28%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XOVR
ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%57.75%6.31%0.08%3.71%0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQA and XOVR have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQA has higher volatility (10.17%) compared to XOVR (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQA dropped -38.44% vs XOVR's -56.28%.

On 5-year performance, QQQA leads with 14.74% vs 6.16% for XOVR. On fees, QQQA is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, XOVR has been the lower-risk option at 4.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QQQA has performed better with a 14.74% return vs 6.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQA is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XOVR.

QQQA has the higher dividend yield at 0.06%, compared with 0.00% for XOVR.

QQQA is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while XOVR is Large Cap Growth Equities. QQQA tracks NASDAQ-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while XOVR tracks ER30TR Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and EntrepreneurShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for QQQA and 0.75% for XOVR.

QQQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.41 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQA and XOVR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer