QQQA vs. QGRW
QQQA (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF) and QGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQA is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while QGRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QQQA returned 34.14%/yr vs 29.12%/yr for QGRW. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQQA charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for QGRW.
Performance
QQQA vs. QGRW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQA achieves a 64.12% return, which is significantly higher than QGRW's 15.43% return.
QQQA
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 19.04%
- YTD
- 64.12%
- 6M
- 67.24%
- 1Y
- 86.88%
- 3Y*
- 34.14%
- 5Y*
- 14.57%
- 10Y*
- —
QGRW
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 8.02%
- YTD
- 15.43%
- 6M
- 14.33%
- 1Y
- 35.04%
- 3Y*
- 29.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQA vs. QGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQA ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | 64.12% | 9.87% | 16.17% | 24.98% | -1.80% |
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund | 15.43% | 19.20% | 34.85% | 56.05% | -3.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQA and QGRW is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2022 | 0.84 |
The correlation between QQQA and QGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
QQQA vs. QGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQQA
QGRW
Technology
Communication Services
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
QQQA
QGRW
Communication Services
QQQA
QGRW
Energy
QQQA
QGRW
Healthcare
QQQA
QGRW
Consumer Cyclical
QQQA
QGRW
Basic Materials
QQQA
-
QGRW
-
Consumer Defensive
QQQA
-
QGRW
Financial Services
QQQA
-
QGRW
Industrials
QQQA
-
QGRW
Real Estate
QQQA
-
QGRW
-
Utilities
QQQA
-
QGRW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQA vs. QGRW — Risk / Return Rank
QQQA
QGRW
QQQA vs. QGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQA | QGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.35 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.01 | 2.28 | +3.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.45 | 8.92 | +13.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQA | QGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.35 | 2.02 | +1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 1.65 | -1.07 |
Drawdowns
QQQA vs. QGRW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQA drawdown since its inception was -38.44%, which is greater than QGRW's maximum drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQA and QGRW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQA | QGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.44% | -24.40% | -14.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.54% | -15.44% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.84% | -24.40% | -6.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.76% | -1.33% | +0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.66% | -3.26% | -12.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.88% | 3.94% | -0.06% |
Volatility
QQQA vs. QGRW - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) has a higher volatility of 10.13% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) at 4.69%. This indicates that QQQA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQA | QGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.13% | 4.69% | +5.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.18% | 13.67% | +8.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.07% | 17.39% | +8.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.82% | 21.07% | +4.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.76% | 21.07% | +4.69% |
QQQA vs. QGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQA has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than QGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQA vs. QGRW - Dividend Comparison
QQQA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than QGRW's 0.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund | 0.07% | 0.09% | 0.14% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQA ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | 0.06% | 0.10% | 0.09% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQA and QGRW have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQA has higher volatility (10.13%) compared to QGRW (4.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQA dropped -38.44% vs QGRW's -24.40%.
On 3-year performance, QQQA leads with 34.14% vs 29.12% for QGRW. On fees, QGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, QGRW has been the lower-risk option at 4.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QQQA has performed better with a 34.14% return vs 29.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for QQQA.
QGRW has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.06% for QQQA.
QQQA is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while QGRW is Large Cap Growth Equities. QQQA tracks NASDAQ-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while QGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for QQQA and 0.28% for QGRW.
QQQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQA and QGRW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer