PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQA vs. QGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQA vs. QGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQA achieves a 64.12% return, which is significantly higher than QGRW's 15.43% return.


QQQA

1D
-0.76%
1M
19.04%
YTD
64.12%
6M
67.24%
1Y
86.88%
3Y*
34.14%
5Y*
14.57%
10Y*

QGRW

1D
0.00%
1M
8.02%
YTD
15.43%
6M
14.33%
1Y
35.04%
3Y*
29.12%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQA vs. QGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
QQQA
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
64.12%9.87%16.17%24.98%-1.80%
QGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund
15.43%19.20%34.85%56.05%-3.30%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQA and QGRW is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2022

0.84

The correlation between QQQA and QGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQQA vs. QGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQQA
QGRW

Technology

65.2%
52.1%

Communication Services

13.7%
17.8%

Energy

9.1%
0.6%

Healthcare

7.8%
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

4.2%
12.4%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

0.5%

Financial Services

-

4.1%

Industrials

-

8.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

0.4%

Technology

QQQA
65.2%
QGRW
52.1%

Communication Services

QQQA
13.7%
QGRW
17.8%

Energy

QQQA
9.1%
QGRW
0.6%

Healthcare

QQQA
7.8%
QGRW
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

QQQA
4.2%
QGRW
12.4%

Basic Materials

QQQA

-

QGRW

-

Consumer Defensive

QQQA

-

QGRW
0.5%

Financial Services

QQQA

-

QGRW
4.1%

Industrials

QQQA

-

QGRW
8.0%

Real Estate

QQQA

-

QGRW

-

Utilities

QQQA

-

QGRW
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQA vs. QGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQA
QQQA Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
QQQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQA Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQA Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

QGRW
QGRW Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
QGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
QGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
QGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
QGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQA vs. QGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQAQGRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.35

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.01

2.28

+3.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.45

8.92

+13.53

QQQA vs. QGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQA Sharpe Ratio is 3.35, which is higher than the QGRW Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQA and QGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQAQGRWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.35

2.02

+1.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

1.65

-1.07

Drawdowns

QQQA vs. QGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQA drawdown since its inception was -38.44%, which is greater than QGRW's maximum drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQA and QGRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQAQGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.44%

-24.40%

-14.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.54%

-15.44%

+0.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.84%

-24.40%

-6.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

-1.33%

+0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.66%

-3.26%

-12.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.88%

3.94%

-0.06%

Volatility

QQQA vs. QGRW - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) has a higher volatility of 10.13% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) at 4.69%. This indicates that QQQA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQAQGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.13%

4.69%

+5.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.18%

13.67%

+8.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.07%

17.39%

+8.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.82%

21.07%

+4.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.76%

21.07%

+4.69%

QQQA vs. QGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQA has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than QGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQA vs. QGRW - Dividend Comparison

QQQA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than QGRW's 0.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
QGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund
0.07%0.09%0.14%0.11%0.00%0.00%
QQQA
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
0.06%0.10%0.09%0.34%0.28%0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQA and QGRW have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQA has higher volatility (10.13%) compared to QGRW (4.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQA dropped -38.44% vs QGRW's -24.40%.

On 3-year performance, QQQA leads with 34.14% vs 29.12% for QGRW. On fees, QGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, QGRW has been the lower-risk option at 4.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, QQQA has performed better with a 34.14% return vs 29.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for QQQA.

QGRW has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.06% for QQQA.

QQQA is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while QGRW is Large Cap Growth Equities. QQQA tracks NASDAQ-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while QGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for QQQA and 0.28% for QGRW.

QQQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQA and QGRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer