PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQ vs. XMMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQ vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QQQ having a 13.58% return and XMMO slightly lower at 13.17%. Over the past 10 years, QQQ has outperformed XMMO with an annualized return of 20.72%, while XMMO has yielded a comparatively lower 18.35% annualized return.


QQQ

1D
0.10%
1M
-5.91%
6M
12.30%
YTD
13.58%
1Y
24.61%
3Y*
23.54%
5Y*
14.68%
10Y*
20.72%
ALL TIME*
10.70%

XMMO

1D
-0.57%
1M
-8.97%
6M
9.46%
YTD
13.17%
1Y
19.87%
3Y*
24.48%
5Y*
13.97%
10Y*
18.35%
ALL TIME*
12.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQ vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
13.58%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
13.17%13.04%38.03%20.39%-16.02%16.69%29.17%36.78%6.12%37.18%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQ and XMMO is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2005

0.78

The correlation between QQQ and XMMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQQ vs. XMMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQQ
XMMO

Technology

60.9%
11.7%

Communication Services

13.1%
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
2.9%

Healthcare

3.6%
7.4%

Industrials

2.7%
42.4%

Utilities

1.1%
5.9%

Basic Materials

1.0%
6.9%

Energy

0.5%
9.8%

Financial Services

0.2%
2.7%

Real Estate

0.1%
6.4%

Technology

QQQ
60.9%
XMMO
11.7%

Communication Services

QQQ
13.1%
XMMO
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

QQQ
10.7%
XMMO
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

QQQ
6.3%
XMMO
2.9%

Healthcare

QQQ
3.6%
XMMO
7.4%

Industrials

QQQ
2.7%
XMMO
42.4%

Utilities

QQQ
1.1%
XMMO
5.9%

Basic Materials

QQQ
1.0%
XMMO
6.9%

Energy

QQQ
0.5%
XMMO
9.8%

Financial Services

QQQ
0.2%
XMMO
2.7%

Real Estate

QQQ
0.1%
XMMO
6.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQ vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQ vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQQXMMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.18

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

1.97

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.22

7.23

-0.01

QQQ vs. XMMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is higher than the XMMO Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQ and XMMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQ vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, which is greater than XMMO's maximum drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and XMMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQXMMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.97%

-55.37%

-27.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.96%

-10.14%

-1.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.77%

-24.93%

+2.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.12%

-27.91%

-7.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

-36.74%

+1.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.61%

-10.14%

+3.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.65%

-9.42%

-23.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

2.76%

+0.66%

Volatility

QQQ vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a higher volatility of 7.41% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) at 6.86%. This indicates that QQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQXMMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.41%

6.86%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.55%

17.53%

-1.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.78%

20.70%

-1.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.81%

21.73%

+1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.45%

22.35%

+0.10%

QQQ vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQ vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than XMMO's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.44%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.62%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQ and XMMO have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQ has higher volatility (7.41%) compared to XMMO (6.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQ dropped -82.97% vs XMMO's -55.37%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 20.72% vs 18.35% for XMMO. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, XMMO has been the lower-risk option at 6.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 20.72% return vs 18.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMMO.

XMMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.44% for QQQ.

QQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while XMMO is Momentum. QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQ and 0.35% for XMMO.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQ and XMMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer