QQQ vs. SGOL
QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) and SGOL (abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while SGOL is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QQQ returned 20.50%/yr vs 11.62%/yr for SGOL. Their 0.06 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. QQQ charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for SGOL.
Performance
QQQ vs. SGOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 11.64% return, which is significantly higher than SGOL's -6.06% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQ has outperformed SGOL with an annualized return of 20.50%, while SGOL has yielded a comparatively lower 11.62% annualized return.
QQQ
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -4.49%
- 6M
- 10.14%
- YTD
- 11.64%
- 1Y
- 21.39%
- 3Y*
- 22.49%
- 5Y*
- 13.87%
- 10Y*
- 20.50%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.62%
SGOL
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- 6M
- -18.71%
- YTD
- -6.06%
- 1Y
- 21.20%
- 3Y*
- 27.11%
- 5Y*
- 17.42%
- 10Y*
- 11.62%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $25.72B | $27.46B | $30.43B | |
| $79.87M | $79.24M | $102.39M |
QQQ vs. SGOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 11.64% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
SGOL abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF | -6.06% | 63.99% | 26.90% | 12.99% | -0.51% | -3.94% | 25.03% | 18.21% | -1.94% | 12.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQ and SGOL is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2009 | 0.06 |
Over the past year, QQQ and SGOL have become more correlated (0.29) than their long-term average of 0.06, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQ vs. SGOL — Risk / Return Rank
QQQ
SGOL
QQQ vs. SGOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQQ | SGOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.15 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 0.77 | +1.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.19 | 1.73 | +4.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQQ vs. SGOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, which is greater than SGOL's maximum drawdown of -45.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and SGOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQ | SGOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.97% | -45.51% | -37.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | -26.32% | +14.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.77% | -26.32% | +3.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.12% | -26.32% | -8.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.12% | -26.32% | -8.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.20% | -24.94% | +16.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.64% | -18.45% | -14.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.51% | 11.64% | -8.13% |
Volatility
QQQ vs. SGOL - Volatility Comparison
Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a higher volatility of 6.74% compared to abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) at 6.07%. This indicates that QQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGOL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQ | SGOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.74% | 6.07% | +0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.61% | 23.69% | -8.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.96% | 27.79% | -8.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.83% | 18.34% | +4.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.46% | 16.08% | +6.38% |
QQQ vs. SGOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SGOL's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QQQ vs. SGOL - Dividend Comparison
QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, while SGOL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
SGOL abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQ and SGOL have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (6.74%) compared to SGOL (6.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQ dropped -82.97% vs SGOL's -45.51%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 20.50% vs 11.62% for SGOL. On fees, SGOL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, SGOL has been the lower-risk option at 6.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 20.50% return vs 11.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SGOL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.00% for SGOL.
QQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SGOL is Gold. QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while SGOL tracks LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQ and 0.17% for SGOL.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQ and SGOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer