QQQ vs. SCHA
QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) and SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while SCHA is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QQQ returned 22.17%/yr vs 11.55%/yr for SCHA. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQQ charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHA.
Performance
QQQ vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 20.71% return, which is significantly lower than SCHA's 23.72% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQ has outperformed SCHA with an annualized return of 22.17%, while SCHA has yielded a comparatively lower 11.55% annualized return.
QQQ
- 1D
- 2.51%
- 1M
- 3.65%
- YTD
- 20.71%
- 6M
- 20.33%
- 1Y
- 41.26%
- 3Y*
- 27.01%
- 5Y*
- 17.37%
- 10Y*
- 22.17%
SCHA
- 1D
- 2.21%
- 1M
- 6.09%
- YTD
- 23.72%
- 6M
- 21.76%
- 1Y
- 44.64%
- 3Y*
- 19.06%
- 5Y*
- 8.37%
- 10Y*
- 11.55%
QQQ vs. SCHA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 20.71% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 23.72% | 11.60% | 11.16% | 18.46% | -19.81% | 16.45% | 19.34% | 26.50% | -11.79% | 14.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQ and SCHA is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009 | 0.75 |
The correlation between QQQ and SCHA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
QQQ vs. SCHA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQQ
SCHA
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
QQQ
SCHA
Communication Services
QQQ
SCHA
Consumer Cyclical
QQQ
SCHA
Consumer Defensive
QQQ
SCHA
Healthcare
QQQ
SCHA
Industrials
QQQ
SCHA
Utilities
QQQ
SCHA
Basic Materials
QQQ
SCHA
Energy
QQQ
SCHA
Financial Services
QQQ
SCHA
Real Estate
QQQ
SCHA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQ vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank
QQQ
SCHA
QQQ vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQQ | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.40 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.42 | 4.71 | -1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.72 | 17.27 | -4.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQQ vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, which is greater than SCHA's maximum drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and SCHA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQ | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.97% | -42.41% | -40.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | -9.50% | -2.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.77% | -27.29% | +4.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.12% | -30.79% | -4.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.12% | -42.41% | +7.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | 0.00% | -0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.73% | -7.56% | -25.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 2.59% | +0.62% |
Volatility
QQQ vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison
Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a higher volatility of 8.58% compared to Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) at 6.69%. This indicates that QQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQ | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.58% | 6.69% | +1.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.34% | 13.81% | +0.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.64% | 18.67% | -1.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.63% | 22.05% | +0.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.42% | 22.77% | -0.35% |
QQQ vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QQQ vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison
QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than SCHA's 0.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 0.97% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.42% | 1.37% | 1.19% | 1.05% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQ and SCHA have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (8.58%) compared to SCHA (6.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQ dropped -82.97% vs SCHA's -42.41%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 22.17% vs 11.55% for SCHA. On fees, SCHA is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHA has been the lower-risk option at 6.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 22.17% return vs 11.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHA is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QQQ.
SCHA has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.
QQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SCHA is Small Cap Blend Equities. QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while SCHA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQ and 0.04% for SCHA.
SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQ and SCHA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer