QQQ vs. RSPU
QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) and RSPU (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while RSPU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Utilities Plus. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QQQ returned 21.79%/yr vs 9.57%/yr for RSPU. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQQ charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPU.
Performance
QQQ vs. RSPU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 17.57% return, which is significantly higher than RSPU's 6.94% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQ has outperformed RSPU with an annualized return of 21.79%, while RSPU has yielded a comparatively lower 9.57% annualized return.
QQQ
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 17.57%
- 6M
- 17.85%
- 1Y
- 37.55%
- 3Y*
- 26.43%
- 5Y*
- 16.85%
- 10Y*
- 21.79%
RSPU
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 6.94%
- 6M
- 7.66%
- 1Y
- 15.11%
- 3Y*
- 15.64%
- 5Y*
- 10.86%
- 10Y*
- 9.57%
QQQ vs. RSPU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 17.57% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
RSPU Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF | 6.94% | 16.82% | 23.57% | -3.45% | 4.37% | 17.13% | -2.70% | 22.94% | 6.89% | 9.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQ and RSPU is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2006 | 0.33 |
Over the past year, the correlation between QQQ and RSPU has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
QQQ vs. RSPU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQQ
RSPU
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
QQQ
RSPU
-
Communication Services
QQQ
RSPU
-
Consumer Cyclical
QQQ
RSPU
-
Consumer Defensive
QQQ
RSPU
-
Healthcare
QQQ
RSPU
-
Industrials
QQQ
RSPU
-
Utilities
QQQ
RSPU
Basic Materials
QQQ
RSPU
-
Energy
QQQ
RSPU
-
Financial Services
QQQ
RSPU
Real Estate
QQQ
RSPU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQ vs. RSPU — Risk / Return Rank
QQQ
RSPU
QQQ vs. RSPU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQQ | RSPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.18 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 1.67 | +1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.22 | 3.77 | +7.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQQ vs. RSPU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, which is greater than RSPU's maximum drawdown of -48.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and RSPU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQ | RSPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.97% | -48.08% | -34.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | -8.46% | -3.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.77% | -16.27% | -6.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.12% | -21.86% | -13.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.12% | -36.85% | +1.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.33% | -5.28% | +1.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.75% | -7.85% | -24.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.20% | 3.75% | -0.55% |
Volatility
QQQ vs. RSPU - Volatility Comparison
Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a higher volatility of 7.56% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF (RSPU) at 5.41%. This indicates that QQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSPU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQ | RSPU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.56% | 5.41% | +2.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.81% | 11.11% | +2.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.19% | 14.10% | +3.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.55% | 16.95% | +5.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.38% | 19.10% | +3.28% |
QQQ vs. RSPU - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPU's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQ vs. RSPU - Dividend Comparison
QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than RSPU's 2.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
RSPU Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF | 2.49% | 2.54% | 2.39% | 2.92% | 2.35% | 2.41% | 2.94% | 2.54% | 3.11% | 3.08% | 2.98% | 4.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQ and RSPU have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (7.56%) compared to RSPU (5.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQ dropped -82.97% vs RSPU's -48.08%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.79% vs 9.57% for RSPU. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, RSPU has been the lower-risk option at 5.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.79% return vs 9.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPU.
RSPU has the higher dividend yield at 2.49%, compared with 0.39% for QQQ.
QQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while RSPU is Utilities Equities. QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while RSPU tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Utilities Plus. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQ and 0.40% for RSPU.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQ and RSPU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer