PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQ vs. PG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQ vs. PG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 18.15% return, which is significantly higher than PG's 5.11% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQ has outperformed PG with an annualized return of 21.81%, while PG has yielded a comparatively lower 8.69% annualized return.


QQQ

1D
2.49%
1M
-1.82%
YTD
18.15%
6M
16.90%
1Y
32.75%
3Y*
25.87%
5Y*
16.05%
10Y*
21.81%

PG

1D
-0.38%
1M
3.41%
YTD
5.11%
6M
4.19%
1Y
-4.47%
3Y*
1.88%
5Y*
4.56%
10Y*
8.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQ vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
18.15%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
5.11%-12.26%17.25%-0.86%-5.05%20.52%14.15%39.70%3.57%12.69%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQ and PG is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 1999

0.30

The correlation between QQQ and PG shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQ vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

PG
PG Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
PG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
PG Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
PG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
PG Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQ vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQQPGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

0.98

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

-0.29

+3.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.06

-0.52

+10.58

QQQ vs. PG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the PG Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQ and PG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQ vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, which is greater than PG's maximum drawdown of -54.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and PG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQPGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.97%

-54.25%

-28.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.96%

-15.52%

+3.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.77%

-21.15%

-1.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.12%

-23.77%

-11.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

-23.77%

-11.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.85%

-13.96%

+11.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.71%

-12.16%

-20.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

8.57%

-5.31%

Volatility

QQQ vs. PG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a higher volatility of 9.43% compared to The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) at 7.27%. This indicates that QQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQPGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.43%

7.27%

+2.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.81%

15.16%

-0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.14%

19.04%

-0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.72%

17.89%

+4.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.41%

19.07%

+3.34%

Dividends

QQQ vs. PG - Dividend Comparison

QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than PG's 2.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
2.87%2.91%2.36%2.55%2.38%2.08%2.24%2.37%3.09%2.98%3.18%3.31%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.42%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQ and PG have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQ has higher volatility (9.43%) compared to PG (7.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQ dropped -82.97% vs PG's -54.25%.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQ and PG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer