QQQ vs. ISLN.L
QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) and ISLN.L (iShares Physical Silver ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while ISLN.L is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QQQ returned 21.79%/yr vs 14.26%/yr for ISLN.L. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQQ charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ISLN.L.
Performance
QQQ vs. ISLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 17.57% return, which is significantly higher than ISLN.L's -5.58% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQ has outperformed ISLN.L with an annualized return of 21.79%, while ISLN.L has yielded a comparatively lower 14.26% annualized return.
QQQ
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 17.57%
- 6M
- 17.85%
- 1Y
- 37.55%
- 3Y*
- 26.43%
- 5Y*
- 16.85%
- 10Y*
- 21.79%
ISLN.L
- 1D
- 5.80%
- 1M
- -20.59%
- YTD
- -5.58%
- 6M
- 9.90%
- 1Y
- 86.37%
- 3Y*
- 41.38%
- 5Y*
- 19.06%
- 10Y*
- 14.26%
QQQ vs. ISLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 17.57% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
ISLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | -5.58% | 147.62% | 21.10% | -0.76% | 3.39% | -12.85% | 45.85% | 16.36% | -8.76% | 3.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQ and ISLN.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2011 | 0.10 |
The correlation between QQQ and ISLN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQ vs. ISLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
QQQ
ISLN.L
QQQ vs. ISLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (ISLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQQ | ISLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.29 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 1.96 | +1.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.22 | 4.36 | +6.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQQ vs. ISLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, which is greater than ISLN.L's maximum drawdown of -76.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and ISLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQ | ISLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.97% | -76.69% | -6.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | -43.83% | +31.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.77% | -43.83% | +21.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.12% | -43.83% | +8.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.12% | -43.83% | +8.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.33% | -40.57% | +37.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.75% | -53.73% | +20.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.20% | 19.70% | -16.50% |
Volatility
QQQ vs. ISLN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) is 7.56%, while iShares Physical Silver ETC (ISLN.L) has a volatility of 15.90%. This indicates that QQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQ | ISLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.56% | 15.90% | -8.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.81% | 54.92% | -41.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.19% | 57.77% | -40.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.55% | 35.79% | -13.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.38% | 31.08% | -8.70% |
QQQ vs. ISLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than ISLN.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QQQ vs. ISLN.L - Dividend Comparison
QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, while ISLN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQ and ISLN.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ISLN.L.
QQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while ISLN.L is Silver. QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while ISLN.L tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQ and 0.20% for ISLN.L.
Find the right allocation for QQQ and ISLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer