PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
QQQ vs. GDMN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

QQQ vs. GDMN

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) and GDMN (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while GDMN is a Commodities fund actively managed by WisdomTree. QQQ is passively managed, while GDMN is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, QQQ returned 27.20%/yr vs 59.33%/yr for GDMN. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQQ charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for GDMN.

Performance

QQQ vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 21.26% return, which is significantly higher than GDMN's -7.24% return.

QQQ

1D
3.14%
1M
4.95%
YTD
21.26%
6M
22.17%
1Y
41.87%
3Y*
27.20%
5Y*
17.59%
10Y*
22.31%

GDMN

1D
7.58%
1M
-7.37%
YTD
-7.24%
6M
-6.40%
1Y
63.42%
3Y*
59.33%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQ vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF		21.26%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%0.33%
GDMN
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund		-7.24%237.09%28.23%12.97%-14.62%6.93%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQ and GDMN is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2021

0.20

The correlation between QQQ and GDMN shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QQQ vs. GDMN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
QQQ
GDMN

Technology

58.7%

-

Communication Services

14.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

11.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.4%

-

Healthcare

3.7%

-

Industrials

2.6%

-

Utilities

1.2%

-

Basic Materials

1.0%
100.0%

Energy

0.5%

-

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

QQQ
58.7%
GDMN

-

Communication Services

QQQ
14.3%
GDMN

-

Consumer Cyclical

QQQ
11.4%
GDMN

-

Consumer Defensive

QQQ
6.4%
GDMN

-

Healthcare

QQQ
3.7%
GDMN

-

Industrials

QQQ
2.6%
GDMN

-

Utilities

QQQ
1.2%
GDMN

-

Basic Materials

QQQ
1.0%
GDMN
100.0%

Energy

QQQ
0.5%
GDMN

-

Financial Services

QQQ
0.2%
GDMN

-

Real Estate

QQQ
0.1%
GDMN

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco QQQ ETF

WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund

Often compared with QQQ:
QQQ vs. SPYQQQ vs. VOOQQQ vs. VGTQQQ vs. TQQQQQQ vs. SMHQQQ vs. QQQMQQQ vs. QQQI
Often compared with GDMN:
GDMN vs. GDXGDMN vs. GDEGDMN vs. GldGDMN vs. GLDGDMN vs. IAUMGDMN vs. IAUGDMN vs. AUMI

Return for Risk

QQQ vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
GDMN
GDMN Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
GDMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDMN Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
GDMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDMN Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQ vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

QQQGDMNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.42
1.00

+1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.12
1.47

+1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.21

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.52

1.31

+2.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.12

3.52

+9.60

QQQ vs. GDMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the GDMN Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQ and GDMN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQ vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, which is greater than GDMN's maximum drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and GDMN.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

QQQGDMNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.97%

-52.82%

-30.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.96%

-48.76%

+36.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.77%

-48.76%

+25.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.12%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-39.10%

+38.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.75%

-19.04%

-13.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

18.18%

-14.98%

Volatility

QQQ vs. GDMN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) is 8.14%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) has a volatility of 23.53%. This indicates that QQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

QQQGDMNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.14%

23.53%

-15.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.12%

54.66%

-40.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.43%

63.80%

-46.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.59%

48.17%

-25.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.41%

48.17%

-25.76%

QQQ vs. GDMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than GDMN's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQ vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison

QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than GDMN's 2.91% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDMN
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund		2.91%2.70%9.44%7.69%1.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF		0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

QQQ and GDMN have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDMN has higher volatility (23.53%) compared to QQQ (8.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQ dropped -82.97% vs GDMN's -52.82%.

On 3-year performance, GDMN leads with 59.33% vs 27.20% for QQQ. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 8.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, GDMN has performed better with a 59.33% return vs 27.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GDMN.

GDMN has the higher dividend yield at 2.91%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.

QQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while GDMN is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQ and 0.45% for GDMN.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQ and GDMN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer