QQQ vs. FSPGX

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) and FSPGX (Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund) are both funds - QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while FSPGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, QQQ returned 16.85%/yr vs 14.07%/yr for FSPGX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. QQQ charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for FSPGX.

Performance

QQQ vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 17.57% return, which is significantly higher than FSPGX's 2.98% return.

QQQ

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: 0.93%
• YTD: 17.57%
• 6M: 17.85%
• 1Y: 35.82%
• 3Y*: 26.43%
• 5Y*: 16.85%
• 10Y*: 21.79%

FSPGX

• 1D: 1.64%
• 1M: -2.14%
• YTD: 2.98%
• 6M: 3.48%
• 1Y: 19.06%
• 3Y*: 22.79%
• 5Y*: 14.07%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQ vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	17.57%	20.77%	25.58%	54.86%	-32.58%	27.42%	48.62%	38.96%	-0.13%	32.66%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	2.98%	18.54%	33.27%	42.77%	-29.17%	27.57%	38.46%	36.38%	-1.79%	27.70%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQ and FSPGX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017	0.97

The correlation between QQQ and FSPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QQQ vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQ

QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 71
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 73
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 70

FSPGX

FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 25
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQ vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQQ	FSPGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.09	1.23	+0.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.73	1.71	+1.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.22	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.01	1.22	+1.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.22	4.03	+7.20

QQQ vs. FSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQ and FSPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQQ vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, which is greater than FSPGX's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and FSPGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQ	FSPGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.97%	-32.66%	-50.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.96%	-16.17%	+4.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.77%	-23.32%	+0.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.12%	-32.66%	-2.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.33%	-5.53%	+2.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.75%	-6.36%	-26.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.20%	4.87%	-1.67%

Volatility

QQQ vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a higher volatility of 7.56% compared to Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) at 5.49%. This indicates that QQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQ	FSPGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.56%	5.49%	+2.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.81%	12.42%	+1.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.19%	15.97%	+1.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.55%	21.57%	+0.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.38%	21.56%	+0.82%

QQQ vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

QQQ vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, more than FSPGX's 0.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	0.33%	0.34%	0.37%	0.73%	0.86%	2.22%	1.76%	1.04%	1.32%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	0.39%	0.45%	0.56%	0.62%	0.80%	0.43%	0.55%	0.74%	0.91%	0.84%	1.06%	0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQ and FSPGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, QQQ and FSPGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, QQQ or FSPGX?

QQQ has higher volatility (7.56%) compared to FSPGX (5.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQ dropped -82.97% vs FSPGX's -32.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.