QQQ vs. CAIQ
QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) and CAIQ (Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - QQQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index while CAIQ tracks the MerQube Nasdaq-100 Vol Advantage Autocallable Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQQ charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for CAIQ.
Performance
QQQ vs. CAIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 21.26% return, which is significantly higher than CAIQ's 12.96% return.
QQQ
- 1D
- 3.14%
- 1M
- 4.95%
- YTD
- 21.26%
- 6M
- 22.17%
- 1Y
- 41.87%
- 3Y*
- 27.20%
- 5Y*
- 17.59%
- 10Y*
- 22.31%
CAIQ
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- YTD
- 12.96%
- 6M
- 14.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ vs. CAIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.26% | 2.54% |
CAIQ Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF | 12.96% | 4.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQ and CAIQ is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | 0.92 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQ vs. CAIQ — Risk / Return Rank
QQQ
CAIQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QQQ vs. CAIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF (CAIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQQ | CAIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.52 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.12 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQQ vs. CAIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, which is greater than CAIQ's maximum drawdown of -9.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and CAIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQ | CAIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.97% | -9.06% | -73.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -0.52% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.75% | -1.70% | -31.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.20% | — | — |
Volatility
QQQ vs. CAIQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQ | CAIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.14% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.12% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.43% | 13.91% | +3.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.59% | 13.91% | +8.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.41% | 13.91% | +8.50% |
QQQ vs. CAIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than CAIQ's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQ vs. CAIQ - Dividend Comparison
QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than CAIQ's 8.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAIQ Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF | 8.50% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, QQQ and CAIQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for CAIQ.
CAIQ has the higher dividend yield at 8.50%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.
QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while CAIQ tracks MerQube Nasdaq-100 Vol Advantage Autocallable Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQ and 0.74% for CAIQ.
Find the right allocation for QQQ and CAIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer