QQMG vs. SPLV

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

QQMG (Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF) and SPLV (Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQMG is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 ESG Total Return Index, while SPLV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QQMG returned 26.76%/yr vs 8.73%/yr for SPLV. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQMG charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for SPLV.

Performance

QQMG vs. SPLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) and Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQMG achieves a 16.21% return, which is significantly higher than SPLV's 5.74% return.

QQMG

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: -1.06%
• YTD: 16.21%
• 6M: 14.47%
• 1Y: 33.85%
• 3Y*: 26.76%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPLV

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: 1.00%
• YTD: 5.74%
• 6M: 5.04%
• 1Y: 4.95%
• 3Y*: 8.73%
• 5Y*: 6.36%
• 10Y*: 8.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQMG vs. SPLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QQMG Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF	16.21%	22.16%	25.66%	55.00%	-31.56%	5.26%
SPLV Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF	5.74%	4.10%	13.93%	0.53%	-4.88%	8.75%

Correlation

The correlation between QQMG and SPLV is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021	0.30

The correlation between QQMG and SPLV shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

QQMG vs. SPLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQMG

QQMG Risk / Return Rank: 59
QQMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
QQMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
QQMG Omega Ratio Rank: 57
QQMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
QQMG Martin Ratio Rank: 60

SPLV

SPLV Risk / Return Rank: 16
SPLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
SPLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
SPLV Omega Ratio Rank: 14
SPLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
SPLV Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQMG vs. SPLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) and Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQMG	SPLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	0.49	+1.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.42	0.75	+1.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.09	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	0.67	+2.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.64	1.55	+8.09

QQMG vs. SPLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQMG Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the SPLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQMG and SPLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQMG vs. SPLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQMG drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, roughly equal to the maximum SPLV drawdown of -36.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQMG and SPLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQMG	SPLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.43%	-36.26%	+0.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.67%	-7.41%	-5.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.79%	-9.64%	-13.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.26%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.03%	-2.84%	-2.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.53%	-3.55%	-5.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.52%	3.21%	+0.31%

Volatility

QQMG vs. SPLV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) has a higher volatility of 9.06% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) at 4.27%. This indicates that QQMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQMG	SPLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.06%	4.27%	+4.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.07%	7.38%	+7.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.67%	10.22%	+8.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.78%	12.50%	+11.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.78%	15.39%	+8.39%

QQMG vs. SPLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQMG has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SPLV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

QQMG vs. SPLV - Dividend Comparison

QQMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than SPLV's 2.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QQMG Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.37%	0.41%	0.50%	0.60%	0.82%	0.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPLV Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF	2.15%	2.04%	1.88%	2.45%	2.11%	1.51%	2.12%	2.08%	2.18%	2.03%	2.03%	2.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQMG and SPLV in my portfolio?

QQMG and SPLV have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQMG or SPLV?

QQMG has higher volatility (9.06%) compared to SPLV (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQMG dropped -35.43% vs SPLV's -36.26%.

Which ETF is better, QQMG or SPLV?

On 3-year performance, QQMG leads with 26.76% vs 8.73% for SPLV. On fees, QQMG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SPLV has been the lower-risk option at 4.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQMG or SPLV?

Over the 3-year period, QQMG has performed better with a 26.76% return vs 8.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQMG or SPLV?

QQMG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SPLV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQMG or SPLV?

SPLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.15%, compared with 0.37% for QQMG.

What is the main difference between QQMG and SPLV?

QQMG is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SPLV is S&P 500. QQMG tracks Nasdaq-100 ESG Total Return Index, while SPLV tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QQMG and 0.25% for SPLV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.