QQMG vs. SPHD
QQMG (Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF) and SPHD (Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQMG is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 ESG Total Return Index, while SPHD is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QQMG returned 29.63%/yr vs 11.42%/yr for SPHD. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQMG charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for SPHD.
Performance
QQMG vs. SPHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQMG achieves a 21.86% return, which is significantly higher than SPHD's 4.38% return.
QQMG
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 11.51%
- YTD
- 21.86%
- 6M
- 20.50%
- 1Y
- 44.32%
- 3Y*
- 29.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPHD
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- -0.82%
- YTD
- 4.38%
- 6M
- 4.63%
- 1Y
- 8.12%
- 3Y*
- 11.42%
- 5Y*
- 5.48%
- 10Y*
- 7.08%
QQMG vs. SPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQMG Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF | 21.86% | 22.16% | 25.66% | 55.00% | -31.56% | 5.01% |
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | 4.38% | 3.41% | 18.08% | 1.32% | 0.58% | 5.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQMG and SPHD is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2021 | 0.31 |
Over the past year, the correlation between QQMG and SPHD has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
QQMG vs. SPHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQMG
SPHD
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
Financial Services
Real Estate
Energy
-
Technology
QQMG
SPHD
Communication Services
QQMG
SPHD
Consumer Cyclical
QQMG
SPHD
Consumer Defensive
QQMG
SPHD
Healthcare
QQMG
SPHD
Industrials
QQMG
SPHD
Basic Materials
QQMG
SPHD
-
Utilities
QQMG
SPHD
Financial Services
QQMG
SPHD
Real Estate
QQMG
SPHD
Energy
QQMG
-
SPHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQMG vs. SPHD — Risk / Return Rank
QQMG
SPHD
QQMG vs. SPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQMG | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.13 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.51 | 1.11 | +2.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.08 | 2.78 | +10.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQMG | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66 | 0.74 | +1.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.58 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
QQMG vs. SPHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQMG drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, smaller than the maximum SPHD drawdown of -41.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQMG and SPHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQMG | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.43% | -41.39% | +5.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.67% | -7.33% | -5.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.79% | -13.29% | -9.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.41% | -5.37% | +4.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.61% | -4.70% | -4.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 2.93% | +0.47% |
Volatility
QQMG vs. SPHD - Volatility Comparison
Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) at 2.99%. This indicates that QQMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQMG | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.76% | 2.99% | +1.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.90% | 7.55% | +5.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.77% | 11.04% | +5.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.60% | 14.16% | +9.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.60% | 17.64% | +5.96% |
QQMG vs. SPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQMG has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SPHD's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQMG vs. SPHD - Dividend Comparison
QQMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than SPHD's 4.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQMG Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.34% | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.60% | 0.82% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | 4.62% | 4.02% | 3.41% | 4.48% | 3.89% | 3.45% | 4.89% | 4.07% | 4.40% | 3.14% | 3.83% | 3.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQMG and SPHD have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQMG has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to SPHD (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQMG dropped -35.43% vs SPHD's -41.39%.
On 3-year performance, QQMG leads with 29.63% vs 11.42% for SPHD. On fees, QQMG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SPHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QQMG has performed better with a 29.63% return vs 11.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQMG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SPHD.
SPHD has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 0.34% for QQMG.
QQMG is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SPHD is Dividend. QQMG tracks Nasdaq-100 ESG Total Return Index, while SPHD tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QQMG and 0.30% for SPHD.
QQMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQMG and SPHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer