PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQMG vs. SPHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQMG vs. SPHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQMG achieves a 21.86% return, which is significantly higher than SPHD's 4.38% return.


QQMG

1D
-0.41%
1M
11.51%
YTD
21.86%
6M
20.50%
1Y
44.32%
3Y*
29.63%
5Y*
10Y*

SPHD

1D
-0.89%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
4.38%
6M
4.63%
1Y
8.12%
3Y*
11.42%
5Y*
5.48%
10Y*
7.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQMG vs. SPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QQMG
Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF
21.86%22.16%25.66%55.00%-31.56%5.01%
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
4.38%3.41%18.08%1.32%0.58%5.27%

Correlation

The correlation between QQMG and SPHD is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2021

0.31

Over the past year, the correlation between QQMG and SPHD has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

QQMG vs. SPHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQMG
SPHD

Technology

62.1%
1.5%

Communication Services

13.0%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

11.5%
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

6.0%
17.8%

Healthcare

3.5%
5.1%

Industrials

2.1%
0.0%

Basic Materials

1.4%

-

Utilities

0.2%
13.7%

Financial Services

0.2%
15.6%

Real Estate

0.1%
20.1%

Energy

-

14.1%

Technology

QQMG
62.1%
SPHD
1.5%

Communication Services

QQMG
13.0%
SPHD
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

QQMG
11.5%
SPHD
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

QQMG
6.0%
SPHD
17.8%

Healthcare

QQMG
3.5%
SPHD
5.1%

Industrials

QQMG
2.1%
SPHD
0.0%

Basic Materials

QQMG
1.4%
SPHD

-

Utilities

QQMG
0.2%
SPHD
13.7%

Financial Services

QQMG
0.2%
SPHD
15.6%

Real Estate

QQMG
0.1%
SPHD
20.1%

Energy

QQMG

-

SPHD
14.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQMG vs. SPHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQMG
QQMG Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QQMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQMG Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QQMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQMG Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHD
SPHD Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
SPHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHD Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHD Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQMG vs. SPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQMGSPHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.13

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

1.11

+2.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.08

2.78

+10.30

QQMG vs. SPHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQMG Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is higher than the SPHD Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQMG and SPHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQMGSPHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66

0.74

+1.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.58

+0.16

Drawdowns

QQMG vs. SPHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQMG drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, smaller than the maximum SPHD drawdown of -41.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQMG and SPHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQMGSPHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.43%

-41.39%

+5.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.67%

-7.33%

-5.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.79%

-13.29%

-9.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-5.37%

+4.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.61%

-4.70%

-4.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.40%

2.93%

+0.47%

Volatility

QQMG vs. SPHD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) has a higher volatility of 4.76% compared to Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) at 2.99%. This indicates that QQMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQMGSPHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.76%

2.99%

+1.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.90%

7.55%

+5.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.77%

11.04%

+5.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.60%

14.16%

+9.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.60%

17.64%

+5.96%

QQMG vs. SPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQMG has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SPHD's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQMG vs. SPHD - Dividend Comparison

QQMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than SPHD's 4.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQMG
Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.34%0.41%0.50%0.60%0.82%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
4.62%4.02%3.41%4.48%3.89%3.45%4.89%4.07%4.40%3.14%3.83%3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQMG and SPHD have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQMG has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to SPHD (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQMG dropped -35.43% vs SPHD's -41.39%.

On 3-year performance, QQMG leads with 29.63% vs 11.42% for SPHD. On fees, QQMG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SPHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, QQMG has performed better with a 29.63% return vs 11.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQMG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SPHD.

SPHD has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 0.34% for QQMG.

QQMG is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SPHD is Dividend. QQMG tracks Nasdaq-100 ESG Total Return Index, while SPHD tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QQMG and 0.30% for SPHD.

QQMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQMG and SPHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer