QQMG vs. QXQ
QQMG (Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF) and QXQ (SGI Enhanced Nasdaq-100 ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. QQMG is passively managed, while QXQ is actively managed. Over the past year, QQMG returned 43.12% vs 42.54% for QXQ. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. QQMG charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for QXQ.
Performance
QQMG vs. QXQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QQMG having a 21.45% return and QXQ slightly lower at 20.42%.
QQMG
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 9.97%
- YTD
- 21.45%
- 6M
- 20.28%
- 1Y
- 43.12%
- 3Y*
- 29.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QXQ
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 8.49%
- YTD
- 20.42%
- 6M
- 19.48%
- 1Y
- 42.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQMG vs. QXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QQMG Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF | 21.45% | 22.16% | 5.32% |
QXQ SGI Enhanced Nasdaq-100 ETF | 20.42% | 19.78% | 9.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQMG and QXQ is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2024 | 0.96 |
The correlation between QQMG and QXQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
QQMG vs. QXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQMG
QXQ
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Basic Materials
Utilities
Financial Services
Real Estate
Energy
-
Technology
QQMG
QXQ
Communication Services
QQMG
QXQ
Consumer Cyclical
QQMG
QXQ
Consumer Defensive
QQMG
QXQ
Healthcare
QQMG
QXQ
Industrials
QQMG
QXQ
Basic Materials
QQMG
QXQ
Utilities
QQMG
QXQ
Financial Services
QQMG
QXQ
Real Estate
QQMG
QXQ
Energy
QQMG
-
QXQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQMG vs. QXQ — Risk / Return Rank
QQMG
QXQ
QQMG vs. QXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) and SGI Enhanced Nasdaq-100 ETF (QXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQMG | QXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.45 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.42 | 3.50 | -0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.72 | 13.98 | -1.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQMG | QXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.58 | 2.66 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 1.22 | -0.48 |
Drawdowns
QQMG vs. QXQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQMG drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, which is greater than QXQ's maximum drawdown of -22.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQMG and QXQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQMG | QXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.43% | -22.53% | -12.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.67% | -12.20% | -0.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | -0.67% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.60% | -3.62% | -5.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 3.05% | +0.35% |
Volatility
QQMG vs. QXQ - Volatility Comparison
Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQMG) has a higher volatility of 4.80% compared to SGI Enhanced Nasdaq-100 ETF (QXQ) at 4.41%. This indicates that QQMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQMG | QXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.80% | 4.41% | +0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.88% | 12.21% | +0.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.77% | 16.06% | +0.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.59% | 21.69% | +1.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.59% | 21.69% | +1.90% |
QQMG vs. QXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQMG has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than QXQ's 0.98% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQMG vs. QXQ - Dividend Comparison
QQMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than QXQ's 14.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQMG Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.34% | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.60% | 0.82% | 0.08% |
QXQ SGI Enhanced Nasdaq-100 ETF | 14.87% | 18.21% | 1.97% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, QQMG and QXQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
QQMG has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to QXQ (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQMG dropped -35.43% vs QXQ's -22.53%.
On 1-year performance, QQMG leads with 43.12% vs 42.54% for QXQ. On fees, QQMG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, QXQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQMG has performed better with a 43.12% return vs 42.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQMG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for QXQ.
QXQ has the higher dividend yield at 14.87%, compared with 0.34% for QQMG.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Summit Global Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QQMG and 0.98% for QXQ.
QXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 2.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQMG and QXQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer