QXQ vs. DYTA

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

QXQ (SGI Enhanced Nasdaq-100 ETF) and DYTA (SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QXQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Summit Global Investments, while DYTA is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by Summit Global Investments. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QXQ returned 42.59% vs 16.87% for DYTA. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QXQ charges 0.98%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for DYTA.

Performance

QXQ vs. DYTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SGI Enhanced Nasdaq-100 ETF (QXQ) and SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF (DYTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QXQ achieves a 19.69% return, which is significantly higher than DYTA's 8.98% return.

QXQ

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 2.66%
• YTD: 19.69%
• 6M: 19.23%
• 1Y: 42.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DYTA

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 2.63%
• YTD: 8.98%
• 6M: 8.97%
• 1Y: 16.87%
• 3Y*: 11.99%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QXQ vs. DYTA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QXQ SGI Enhanced Nasdaq-100 ETF	19.69%	19.78%	9.70%
DYTA SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF	8.98%	6.95%	2.83%

Correlation

The correlation between QXQ and DYTA is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2024	0.74

The correlation between QXQ and DYTA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QXQ vs. DYTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QXQ

QXQ Risk / Return Rank: 75
QXQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
QXQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
QXQ Omega Ratio Rank: 74
QXQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
QXQ Martin Ratio Rank: 74

DYTA

DYTA Risk / Return Rank: 50
DYTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
DYTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
DYTA Omega Ratio Rank: 62
DYTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
DYTA Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QXQ vs. DYTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SGI Enhanced Nasdaq-100 ETF (QXQ) and SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF (DYTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QXQ	DYTA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.45	1.65	+0.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.18	2.33	+0.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.36	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.51	1.82	+1.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.55	9.24	+4.32

QXQ vs. DYTA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QXQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the DYTA Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QXQ and DYTA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QXQ vs. DYTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QXQ drawdown since its inception was -22.53%, which is greater than DYTA's maximum drawdown of -9.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QXQ and DYTA.

Drawdown Indicators

	QXQ	DYTA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.53%	-9.41%	-13.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.20%	-9.33%	-2.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.27%	0.00%	-1.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.61%	-2.19%	-1.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.15%	1.83%	+1.32%

Volatility

QXQ vs. DYTA - Volatility Comparison

SGI Enhanced Nasdaq-100 ETF (QXQ) has a higher volatility of 7.99% compared to SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF (DYTA) at 3.68%. This indicates that QXQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DYTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QXQ	DYTA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.99%	3.68%	+4.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.00%	9.92%	+4.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.49%	10.26%	+7.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.07%	10.91%	+11.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.07%	10.91%	+11.16%

QXQ vs. DYTA - Expense Ratio Comparison

QXQ has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than DYTA's 1.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

QXQ vs. DYTA - Dividend Comparison

QXQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.96%, more than DYTA's 1.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
DYTA SGI Dynamic Tactical ETF	1.50%	1.64%	10.80%	0.89%
QXQ SGI Enhanced Nasdaq-100 ETF	14.96%	18.21%	1.97%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QXQ and DYTA in my portfolio?

QXQ and DYTA have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QXQ or DYTA?

QXQ has higher volatility (7.99%) compared to DYTA (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QXQ dropped -22.53% vs DYTA's -9.41%.

Which ETF is better, QXQ or DYTA?

On 1-year performance, QXQ leads with 42.59% vs 16.87% for DYTA. On fees, QXQ is cheaper at 0.98% per year. On volatility, DYTA has been the lower-risk option at 3.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QXQ or DYTA?

Over the 1-year period, QXQ has performed better with a 42.59% return vs 16.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QXQ or DYTA?

QXQ is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for DYTA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QXQ or DYTA?

QXQ has the higher dividend yield at 14.96%, compared with 1.50% for DYTA.

What is the main difference between QXQ and DYTA?

QXQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while DYTA is Global Allocation. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for QXQ and 1.04% for DYTA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.