PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQLV vs. RSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQLV vs. RSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF (QQLV) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQLV achieves a 1.94% return, which is significantly lower than RSP's 9.70% return.


QQLV

1D
-0.03%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
1.94%
6M
1.06%
1Y
-1.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RSP

1D
-0.38%
1M
3.77%
YTD
9.70%
6M
10.18%
1Y
19.50%
3Y*
15.23%
5Y*
8.33%
10Y*
11.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQLV vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQLV
Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF
1.94%4.19%-5.60%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
9.70%11.21%-5.63%

Correlation

The correlation between QQLV and RSP is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2024

0.71

The correlation between QQLV and RSP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQLV vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQLV
QQLV Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
QQLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQLV Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
QQLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQLV Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

RSP
RSP Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQLV vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF (QQLV) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQLVRSPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.30

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.27

2.49

-2.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.52

9.48

-10.00

QQLV vs. RSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQLV Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is lower than the RSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQLV and RSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQLVRSPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.19

1.70

-1.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.57

-0.55

Drawdowns

QQLV vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQLV drawdown since its inception was -9.54%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQLV and RSP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQLVRSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.54%

-59.92%

+50.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.35%

-7.85%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.61%

-0.38%

-3.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.19%

-6.65%

+3.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.73%

2.06%

+1.67%

Volatility

QQLV vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF (QQLV) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) have volatilities of 2.66% and 2.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQLVRSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

2.56%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.05%

8.29%

-1.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.13%

11.56%

-1.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.70%

16.18%

-3.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.70%

18.35%

-5.65%

QQLV vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QQLV vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison

QQLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, more than RSP's 1.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQLV
Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF
2.06%1.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.49%1.64%1.52%1.64%1.82%1.28%1.64%1.69%2.02%1.52%1.20%1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQLV and RSP have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQLV has higher volatility (2.66%) compared to RSP (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQLV dropped -9.54% vs RSP's -59.92%.

On 1-year performance, RSP leads with 19.50% vs -1.95% for QQLV. On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RSP has performed better with a 19.50% return vs -1.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QQLV.

QQLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.06%, compared with 1.49% for RSP.

QQLV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while RSP is S&P 500. QQLV tracks Nasdaq Low Volatility Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QQLV and 0.20% for RSP.

RSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQLV and RSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer