PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQLV vs. QQQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQLV vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF (QQLV) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQLV achieves a 1.94% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 21.39% return.


QQLV

1D
-0.03%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
1.94%
6M
1.06%
1Y
-1.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQM

1D
-0.20%
1M
10.67%
YTD
21.39%
6M
19.75%
1Y
41.98%
3Y*
28.89%
5Y*
18.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQLV vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQLV
Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF
1.94%4.19%-5.60%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
21.39%20.85%-2.14%

Correlation

The correlation between QQLV and QQQM is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2024

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQLV vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQLV
QQLV Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
QQLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQLV Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
QQLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQLV Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQLV vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF (QQLV) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQLVQQQMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.19

2.65

-2.85

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.20

3.46

-3.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.45

-0.48

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.27

3.53

-3.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.52

13.52

-14.04

QQLV vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQLV Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is lower than the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQLV and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQLVQQQMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.19

2.65

-2.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.85

-0.83

Drawdowns

QQLV vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQLV drawdown since its inception was -9.54%, smaller than the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQLV and QQQM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQLVQQQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.54%

-35.04%

+25.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.35%

-11.96%

+4.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.61%

-0.20%

-3.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.19%

-8.25%

+5.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.73%

3.11%

+0.62%

Volatility

QQLV vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF (QQLV) is 2.66%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that QQLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQLVQQQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

4.48%

-1.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.05%

12.05%

-5.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.13%

15.91%

-5.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.70%

22.24%

-9.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.70%

22.12%

-9.42%

QQLV vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QQLV vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

QQLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, more than QQQM's 0.41% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
QQLV
Invesco QQQ Low Volatility ETF
2.06%1.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.41%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQLV and QQQM have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQM has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to QQLV (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQLV dropped -9.54% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

On 1-year performance, QQQM leads with 41.98% vs -1.95% for QQLV. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QQLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 41.98% return vs -1.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QQLV.

QQLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.06%, compared with 0.41% for QQQM.

QQLV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. QQLV tracks Nasdaq Low Volatility Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QQLV and 0.15% for QQQM.

QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQLV and QQQM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer