QQHG vs. VAMO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) and Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO).

QQHG and VAMO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QQHG is an actively managed fund by Invesco. It was launched on May 5, 2025. VAMO is an actively managed fund by Cambria. It was launched on Sep 8, 2015.

Performance

QQHG vs. VAMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) and Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QQHG vs. VAMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QQHG Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF	-1.76%	20.59%
VAMO Cambria Value and Momentum ETF	3.84%	16.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQHG achieves a -1.76% return, which is significantly lower than VAMO's 3.84% return.

QQHG

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: -2.23%
• YTD: -1.76%
• 6M: 0.14%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VAMO

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 0.18%
• YTD: 3.84%
• 6M: 6.46%
• 1Y: 22.03%
• 3Y*: 13.40%
• 5Y*: 9.57%
• 10Y*: 5.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQHG vs. VAMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQHG has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than VAMO's 0.65% expense ratio.

VAMO

Cambria Value and Momentum ETF

QQHG

Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF

Return for Risk

QQHG vs. VAMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VAMO

VAMO Risk / Return Rank: 90
VAMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
VAMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
VAMO Omega Ratio Rank: 84
VAMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
VAMO Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQHG vs. VAMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) and Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQHG	VAMO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.94	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.54	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.17	0.25	+1.92

Correlation

The correlation between QQHG and VAMO is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

QQHG vs. VAMO - Dividend Comparison

QQHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than VAMO's 0.63% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QQHG Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF	0.23%	0.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VAMO Cambria Value and Momentum ETF	0.63%	1.41%	0.84%	1.35%	1.10%	1.07%	1.03%	1.15%	1.03%	0.35%	0.56%	0.20%

Drawdowns

QQHG vs. VAMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQHG drawdown since its inception was -6.18%, smaller than the maximum VAMO drawdown of -41.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQHG and VAMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQHG	VAMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.18%	-41.84%	+35.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.55%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.25%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.84%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.64%	-2.11%	-1.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.06%	-10.10%	+9.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.71%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QQHG	VAMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.97%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.76%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.60%	11.39%	-1.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.60%	17.89%	-8.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.60%	18.08%	-8.48%