PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQHG vs. SPYH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQHG vs. SPYH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) and NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQHG achieves a 11.43% return, which is significantly higher than SPYH's 5.74% return.


QQHG

1D
-0.26%
1M
4.73%
YTD
11.43%
6M
10.75%
1Y
26.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPYH

1D
-0.39%
1M
3.32%
YTD
5.74%
6M
6.16%
1Y
18.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQHG vs. SPYH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QQHG and SPYH is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2025

0.90

The correlation between QQHG and SPYH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQHG vs. SPYH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQHG
QQHG Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
QQHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQHG Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
QQHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQHG Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYH
SPYH Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SPYH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYH Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYH Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQHG vs. SPYH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) and NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQHGSPYHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.46

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.30

3.13

+1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.07

15.14

+1.93

QQHG vs. SPYH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQHG Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is comparable to the SPYH Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQHG and SPYH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQHGSPYHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.82

2.42

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.35

1.93

+1.42

Drawdowns

QQHG vs. SPYH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQHG drawdown since its inception was -6.18%, roughly equal to the maximum SPYH drawdown of -6.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQHG and SPYH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQHGSPYHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.18%

-6.39%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.18%

-6.02%

-0.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-0.39%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.97%

-0.71%

-0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

1.24%

+0.31%

Volatility

QQHG vs. SPYH - Volatility Comparison

Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) has a higher volatility of 2.12% compared to NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH) at 1.55%. This indicates that QQHG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQHGSPYHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.12%

1.55%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.66%

5.78%

+0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.47%

7.80%

+1.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.53%

12.36%

-2.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.53%

12.36%

-2.83%

QQHG vs. SPYH - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQHG has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than SPYH's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQHG vs. SPYH - Dividend Comparison

QQHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than SPYH's 7.54% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, QQHG and SPYH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QQHG has higher volatility (2.12%) compared to SPYH (1.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQHG dropped -6.18% vs SPYH's -6.39%.

On 1-year performance, QQHG leads with 26.43% vs 18.78% for SPYH. On fees, QQHG is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, SPYH has been the lower-risk option at 1.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQHG has performed better with a 26.43% return vs 18.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQHG is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for SPYH.

SPYH has the higher dividend yield at 7.54%, compared with 0.20% for QQHG.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and NEOS. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for QQHG and 0.68% for SPYH.

QQHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQHG and SPYH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer