QQH vs. TSXU
QQH (HCM Defender 100 Index ETF) and TSXU (Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - QQH is a Technology Equities fund tracking the HCM Defender 100 Index, while TSXU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQH charges 1.14%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSXU.
Performance
QQH vs. TSXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQH achieves a 14.78% return, which is significantly lower than TSXU's 141.91% return.
QQH
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 14.19%
- YTD
- 14.78%
- 6M
- 12.39%
- 1Y
- 40.27%
- 3Y*
- 26.06%
- 5Y*
- 15.09%
- 10Y*
- —
TSXU
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 66.50%
- YTD
- 141.91%
- 6M
- 130.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQH vs. TSXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QQH HCM Defender 100 Index ETF | 14.78% | 0.99% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 141.91% | 13.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQH and TSXU is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQH vs. TSXU — Risk / Return Rank
QQH
TSXU
QQH vs. TSXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) and Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares (TSXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQH | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.97 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.53 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.81 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQH | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 4.53 | -3.68 |
Drawdowns
QQH vs. TSXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQH drawdown since its inception was -41.87%, which is greater than TSXU's maximum drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQH and TSXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQH | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.87% | -35.62% | -6.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.56% | -0.92% | +0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.94% | -10.56% | -2.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.93% | — | — |
Volatility
QQH vs. TSXU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQH | TSXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.03% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.47% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.57% | 78.68% | -58.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.51% | 78.68% | -57.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.73% | 78.68% | -53.95% |
QQH vs. TSXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQH has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than TSXU's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQH vs. TSXU - Dividend Comparison
QQH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than TSXU's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQH HCM Defender 100 Index ETF | 0.18% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.21% |
TSXU Direxion Daily Semiconductors Top 5 Bull 2X Shares | 1.20% | 2.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQH and TSXU have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSXU is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSXU is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for QQH.
TSXU has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.18% for QQH.
QQH is categorized as Technology Equities, while TSXU is Leveraged Equities. QQH tracks HCM Defender 100 Index, while TSXU tracks Solactive Semiconductor Top 5 Index (2x). They also come from different issuers: Howard Capital Management and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for QQH and 1.05% for TSXU.
Find the right allocation for QQH and TSXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer