PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQH vs. SOXX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQH vs. SOXX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQH achieves a 6.74% return, which is significantly lower than SOXX's 100.58% return.


QQH

1D
-4.16%
1M
-2.80%
YTD
6.74%
6M
4.72%
1Y
28.70%
3Y*
21.78%
5Y*
12.07%
10Y*

SOXX

1D
-7.88%
1M
12.35%
YTD
100.58%
6M
98.07%
1Y
167.63%
3Y*
56.18%
5Y*
33.69%
10Y*
36.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQH vs. SOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QQH
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
6.74%15.66%33.64%48.05%-39.60%37.52%41.71%15.09%
SOXX
iShares Semiconductor ETF
100.58%40.74%12.92%67.12%-35.09%44.09%52.72%20.55%

Correlation

The correlation between QQH and SOXX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2019

0.79

The correlation between QQH and SOXX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQH vs. SOXX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQH
QQH Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
QQH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQH Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
QQH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQH Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

SOXX
SOXX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SOXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOXX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SOXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOXX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQH vs. SOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQHSOXXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.60

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

10.70

-8.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.73

38.46

-33.73

QQH vs. SOXX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQH Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the SOXX Sharpe Ratio of 4.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQH and SOXX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQH vs. SOXX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQH drawdown since its inception was -41.87%, smaller than the maximum SOXX drawdown of -70.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQH and SOXX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQHSOXXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.87%

-70.21%

+28.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.18%

-15.77%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.84%

-41.36%

+16.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.87%

-45.75%

+3.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.53%

-7.88%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.87%

-19.94%

+7.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.08%

4.38%

+1.70%

Volatility

QQH vs. SOXX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) is 11.82%, while iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) has a volatility of 22.75%. This indicates that QQH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQHSOXXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.82%

22.75%

-10.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.82%

33.44%

-15.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.13%

39.42%

-16.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.02%

37.21%

-15.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.00%

34.00%

-9.00%

QQH vs. SOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQH has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXX's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQH vs. SOXX - Dividend Comparison

QQH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than SOXX's 0.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQH
HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
0.20%0.21%0.24%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SOXX
iShares Semiconductor ETF
0.24%0.57%0.67%0.78%1.26%0.64%0.81%1.23%1.37%0.90%1.08%1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQH and SOXX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SOXX has higher volatility (22.75%) compared to QQH (11.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQH dropped -41.87% vs SOXX's -70.21%.

On 5-year performance, SOXX leads with 33.69% vs 12.07% for QQH. On fees, SOXX is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, QQH has been the lower-risk option at 11.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SOXX has performed better with a 33.69% return vs 12.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SOXX is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for QQH.

SOXX has the higher dividend yield at 0.24%, compared with 0.20% for QQH.

QQH is categorized as Technology Equities, while SOXX is Semiconductors. QQH tracks HCM Defender 100 Index, while SOXX tracks NYSE Semiconductor Index. They also come from different issuers: Howard Capital Management and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for QQH and 0.34% for SOXX.

SOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.28 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQH and SOXX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer