QQH vs. FTXL
QQH (HCM Defender 100 Index ETF) and FTXL (First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQH is a Technology Equities fund tracking the HCM Defender 100 Index, while FTXL is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QQH returned 15.09%/yr vs 34.63%/yr for FTXL. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQH charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTXL.
Performance
QQH vs. FTXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQH achieves a 14.78% return, which is significantly lower than FTXL's 115.70% return.
QQH
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 14.19%
- YTD
- 14.78%
- 6M
- 12.39%
- 1Y
- 40.27%
- 3Y*
- 26.06%
- 5Y*
- 15.09%
- 10Y*
- —
FTXL
- 1D
- 2.21%
- 1M
- 30.59%
- YTD
- 115.70%
- 6M
- 113.17%
- 1Y
- 225.15%
- 3Y*
- 61.52%
- 5Y*
- 34.63%
- 10Y*
- —
QQH vs. FTXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQH HCM Defender 100 Index ETF | 14.78% | 15.66% | 33.64% | 48.05% | -39.60% | 37.52% | 41.71% | 15.13% |
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 115.70% | 48.94% | 7.59% | 54.41% | -33.88% | 36.04% | 46.08% | 19.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQH and FTXL is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2019 | 0.76 |
The correlation between QQH and FTXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
QQH vs. FTXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQH
FTXL
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
QQH
FTXL
Communication Services
QQH
FTXL
-
Consumer Cyclical
QQH
FTXL
-
Consumer Defensive
QQH
FTXL
-
Healthcare
QQH
FTXL
-
Industrials
QQH
FTXL
Utilities
QQH
FTXL
-
Basic Materials
QQH
FTXL
-
Energy
QQH
FTXL
-
Financial Services
QQH
FTXL
-
Real Estate
QQH
FTXL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQH vs. FTXL — Risk / Return Rank
QQH
FTXL
QQH vs. FTXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) and First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQH | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.78 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | 15.62 | -13.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.81 | 58.28 | -51.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQH | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | 6.33 | -4.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.97 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.94 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
QQH vs. FTXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQH drawdown since its inception was -41.87%, roughly equal to the maximum FTXL drawdown of -43.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQH and FTXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQH | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.87% | -43.87% | +2.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.18% | -14.51% | -1.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.84% | -41.57% | +16.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.87% | -43.87% | +2.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.56% | 0.00% | -0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.94% | -10.56% | -2.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.93% | 3.88% | +2.05% |
Volatility
QQH vs. FTXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) is 6.03%, while First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF (FTXL) has a volatility of 14.28%. This indicates that QQH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQH | FTXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.03% | 14.28% | -8.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.47% | 28.98% | -14.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.57% | 35.94% | -15.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.51% | 36.02% | -14.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.73% | 34.25% | -9.52% |
QQH vs. FTXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQH has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than FTXL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQH vs. FTXL - Dividend Comparison
QQH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, more than FTXL's 0.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXL First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF | 0.12% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 0.60% | 0.89% | 0.25% | 0.48% | 0.92% | 0.71% | 0.47% | 0.12% |
QQH HCM Defender 100 Index ETF | 0.18% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQH and FTXL have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTXL has higher volatility (14.28%) compared to QQH (6.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQH dropped -41.87% vs FTXL's -43.87%.
On 5-year performance, FTXL leads with 34.63% vs 15.09% for QQH. On fees, FTXL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QQH has been the lower-risk option at 6.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FTXL has performed better with a 34.63% return vs 15.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTXL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for QQH.
QQH has the higher dividend yield at 0.18%, compared with 0.12% for FTXL.
QQH is categorized as Technology Equities, while FTXL is Semiconductors. QQH tracks HCM Defender 100 Index, while FTXL tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Semiconductor Index. They also come from different issuers: Howard Capital Management and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.14% for QQH and 0.60% for FTXL.
FTXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.33 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQH and FTXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer