PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQEW vs. KNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQEW vs. KNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund (QQEW) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQEW achieves a 12.15% return, which is significantly higher than KNG's 2.20% return.


QQEW

1D
-0.78%
1M
14.51%
YTD
12.15%
6M
10.58%
1Y
20.94%
3Y*
16.13%
5Y*
8.78%
10Y*
14.57%

KNG

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.89%
YTD
2.20%
6M
2.33%
1Y
7.44%
3Y*
7.06%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQEW vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
QQEW
First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund
12.15%14.22%7.00%33.31%-24.59%17.75%37.30%35.87%-5.94%
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
2.20%6.63%5.99%7.48%-7.03%24.78%7.21%26.64%-0.84%

Correlation

The correlation between QQEW and KNG is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018

0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between QQEW and KNG has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

QQEW vs. KNG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQEW
KNG

Technology

55.9%
4.3%

Healthcare

14.7%
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
5.5%

Communication Services

10.3%

-

Industrials

3.3%
20.3%

Consumer Defensive

2.0%
23.5%

Real Estate

1.6%
4.4%

Basic Materials

-

10.2%

Energy

-

3.0%

Financial Services

-

12.7%

Utilities

-

6.1%

Technology

QQEW
55.9%
KNG
4.3%

Healthcare

QQEW
14.7%
KNG
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

QQEW
12.2%
KNG
5.5%

Communication Services

QQEW
10.3%
KNG

-

Industrials

QQEW
3.3%
KNG
20.3%

Consumer Defensive

QQEW
2.0%
KNG
23.5%

Real Estate

QQEW
1.6%
KNG
4.4%

Basic Materials

QQEW

-

KNG
10.2%

Energy

QQEW

-

KNG
3.0%

Financial Services

QQEW

-

KNG
12.7%

Utilities

QQEW

-

KNG
6.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQEW vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQEW
QQEW Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
QQEW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQEW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQEW Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
QQEW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQEW Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

KNG
KNG Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
KNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNG Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
KNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNG Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQEW vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund (QQEW) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQEWKNGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.13

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

0.87

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.09

2.25

+1.84

QQEW vs. KNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQEW Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the KNG Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQEW and KNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQEWKNGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

0.73

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.32

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.49

+0.04

Drawdowns

QQEW vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQEW drawdown since its inception was -58.16%, which is greater than KNG's maximum drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQEW and KNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQEWKNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.16%

-35.12%

-23.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.74%

-8.61%

-7.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.43%

-14.24%

-7.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.12%

-18.20%

-13.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.53%

-5.89%

+4.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.30%

-4.13%

-4.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.13%

3.32%

+1.81%

Volatility

QQEW vs. KNG - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund (QQEW) has a higher volatility of 5.54% compared to FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) at 2.29%. This indicates that QQEW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQEWKNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.54%

2.29%

+3.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.85%

7.39%

+6.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.81%

10.19%

+6.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.76%

13.59%

+7.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.87%

17.18%

+3.69%

QQEW vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQEW has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than KNG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQEW vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison

QQEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than KNG's 8.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
8.67%8.61%9.08%5.91%4.00%3.45%3.62%4.09%3.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQEW
First Trust Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund
0.28%0.41%0.57%0.70%0.66%0.24%0.34%0.48%0.56%0.48%0.73%0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQEW and KNG have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQEW has higher volatility (5.54%) compared to KNG (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQEW dropped -58.16% vs KNG's -35.12%.

On 5-year performance, QQEW leads with 8.78% vs 4.31% for KNG. On fees, QQEW is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, KNG has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QQEW has performed better with a 8.78% return vs 4.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQEW is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for KNG.

KNG has the higher dividend yield at 8.67%, compared with 0.28% for QQEW.

QQEW is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while KNG is Dividend. QQEW tracks NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index, while KNG tracks Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for QQEW and 0.75% for KNG.

QQEW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQEW and KNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer