PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQA vs. QDVO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQA vs. QDVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQA achieves a 14.57% return, which is significantly higher than QDVO's 9.80% return.


QQA

1D
-0.10%
1M
7.03%
YTD
14.57%
6M
14.20%
1Y
32.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QDVO

1D
-0.55%
1M
4.45%
YTD
9.80%
6M
9.65%
1Y
27.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQA vs. QDVO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQA
Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF
14.57%17.24%8.86%
QDVO
Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF
9.80%20.16%11.80%

Correlation

The correlation between QQA and QDVO is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2024

0.87

The correlation between QQA and QDVO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQA vs. QDVO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQA
QDVO

Technology

53.8%
50.6%

Communication Services

15.8%
16.8%

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
6.3%

Healthcare

4.2%
4.6%

Industrials

2.8%
1.7%

Utilities

1.4%
0.7%

Basic Materials

1.1%
1.8%

Energy

0.6%
0.8%

Financial Services

0.2%
4.1%

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

QQA
53.8%
QDVO
50.6%

Communication Services

QQA
15.8%
QDVO
16.8%

Consumer Cyclical

QQA
12.3%
QDVO
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

QQA
7.7%
QDVO
6.3%

Healthcare

QQA
4.2%
QDVO
4.6%

Industrials

QQA
2.8%
QDVO
1.7%

Utilities

QQA
1.4%
QDVO
0.7%

Basic Materials

QQA
1.1%
QDVO
1.8%

Energy

QQA
0.6%
QDVO
0.8%

Financial Services

QQA
0.2%
QDVO
4.1%

Real Estate

QQA
0.1%
QDVO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQA vs. QDVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQA
QQA Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
QQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQA Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
QQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQA Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

QDVO
QDVO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
QDVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVO Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVO Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQA vs. QDVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQAQDVODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.57

2.26

+0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.47

3.10

+0.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.40

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

2.70

+1.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.59

10.98

+5.62

QQA vs. QDVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQA Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is comparable to the QDVO Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQA and QDVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQAQDVODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57

2.26

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.18

1.41

-0.24

Drawdowns

QQA vs. QDVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQA drawdown since its inception was -19.73%, which is greater than QDVO's maximum drawdown of -17.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQA and QDVO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQAQDVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.73%

-17.75%

-1.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.76%

-10.21%

+1.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-0.94%

+0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.44%

-2.37%

-0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

2.51%

-0.56%

Volatility

QQA vs. QDVO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) have volatilities of 2.91% and 2.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQAQDVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

2.89%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.68%

8.87%

+0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.59%

12.22%

+0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.27%

17.44%

+0.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.27%

17.44%

+0.83%

QQA vs. QDVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQA has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than QDVO's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQA vs. QDVO - Dividend Comparison

QQA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.29%, less than QDVO's 10.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
QDVO
Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF
10.12%9.92%2.79%
QQA
Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF
9.29%9.78%4.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQA and QDVO have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQA has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to QDVO (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQA dropped -19.73% vs QDVO's -17.75%.

On 1-year performance, QQA leads with 32.22% vs 27.43% for QDVO. On fees, QQA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQA has performed better with a 32.22% return vs 27.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for QDVO.

QDVO has the higher dividend yield at 10.12%, compared with 9.29% for QQA.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for QQA and 0.55% for QDVO.

QQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQA and QDVO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer