QQA vs. QDVO
QQA (Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF) and QDVO (Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QQA returned 32.22% vs 27.43% for QDVO. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQA charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for QDVO.
Performance
QQA vs. QDVO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQA achieves a 14.57% return, which is significantly higher than QDVO's 9.80% return.
QQA
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 7.03%
- YTD
- 14.57%
- 6M
- 14.20%
- 1Y
- 32.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QDVO
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 4.45%
- YTD
- 9.80%
- 6M
- 9.65%
- 1Y
- 27.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQA vs. QDVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF | 14.57% | 17.24% | 8.86% |
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF | 9.80% | 20.16% | 11.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQA and QDVO is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2024 | 0.87 |
The correlation between QQA and QDVO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
QQA vs. QDVO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQA
QDVO
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
QQA
QDVO
Communication Services
QQA
QDVO
Consumer Cyclical
QQA
QDVO
Consumer Defensive
QQA
QDVO
Healthcare
QQA
QDVO
Industrials
QQA
QDVO
Utilities
QQA
QDVO
Basic Materials
QQA
QDVO
Energy
QQA
QDVO
Financial Services
QQA
QDVO
Real Estate
QQA
QDVO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQA vs. QDVO — Risk / Return Rank
QQA
QDVO
QQA vs. QDVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQA | QDVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.57 | 2.26 | +0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.47 | 3.10 | +0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.40 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 2.70 | +1.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.59 | 10.98 | +5.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQA | QDVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.57 | 2.26 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.18 | 1.41 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
QQA vs. QDVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQA drawdown since its inception was -19.73%, which is greater than QDVO's maximum drawdown of -17.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQA and QDVO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQA | QDVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.73% | -17.75% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.76% | -10.21% | +1.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -0.94% | +0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.44% | -2.37% | -0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 2.51% | -0.56% |
Volatility
QQA vs. QDVO - Volatility Comparison
Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO) have volatilities of 2.91% and 2.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQA | QDVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.91% | 2.89% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.68% | 8.87% | +0.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.59% | 12.22% | +0.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 17.44% | +0.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 17.44% | +0.83% |
QQA vs. QDVO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQA has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than QDVO's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQA vs. QDVO - Dividend Comparison
QQA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.29%, less than QDVO's 10.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF | 10.12% | 9.92% | 2.79% |
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF | 9.29% | 9.78% | 4.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQA and QDVO have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQA has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to QDVO (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQA dropped -19.73% vs QDVO's -17.75%.
On 1-year performance, QQA leads with 32.22% vs 27.43% for QDVO. On fees, QQA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQA has performed better with a 32.22% return vs 27.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for QDVO.
QDVO has the higher dividend yield at 10.12%, compared with 9.29% for QQA.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for QQA and 0.55% for QDVO.
QQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQA and QDVO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer