QQ.L vs. PYPL
QQ.L (QinetiQ Group plc) and PYPL (PayPal Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. QQ.L operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while PYPL operates in Credit Services (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, QQ.L returned 9.80%/yr vs 1.73%/yr for PYPL. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
QQ.L vs. PYPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
QQ.L is traded in GBp, while PYPL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PYPL values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQ.L achieves a 7.91% return, which is significantly higher than PYPL's -28.05% return. Over the past 10 years, QQ.L has outperformed PYPL with an annualized return of 9.80%, while PYPL has yielded a comparatively lower 1.73% annualized return.
QQ.L
- 1D
- -1.95%
- 1M
- 15.85%
- YTD
- 7.91%
- 6M
- 10.66%
- 1Y
- -4.50%
- 3Y*
- 11.03%
- 5Y*
- 8.52%
- 10Y*
- 9.80%
PYPL
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -7.07%
- YTD
- -28.05%
- 6M
- -32.39%
- 1Y
- -43.12%
- 3Y*
- -14.73%
- 5Y*
- -30.47%
- 10Y*
- 1.73%
QQ.L vs. PYPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQ.L QinetiQ Group plc | 7.91% | 8.34% | 37.22% | -11.50% | 37.15% | -15.08% | -8.68% | 27.80% | 27.13% | -9.87% |
PYPL PayPal Holdings, Inc. | -28.05% | -36.33% | 41.41% | -18.08% | -57.74% | -18.72% | 110.15% | 23.74% | 20.99% | 70.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQ.L and PYPL is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2015 | 0.04 |
Fundamentals
QQ.L:
£2.47B
PYPL:
$38.21B
QQ.L:
-£0.14
PYPL:
$5.31
QQ.L:
0.67
PYPL:
1.17
QQ.L:
4.47
PYPL:
1.91
QQ.L:
£3.85B
PYPL:
$33.73B
QQ.L:
£372.10M
PYPL:
$15.56B
QQ.L:
£533.20M
PYPL:
$7.23B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQ.L vs. PYPL — Risk / Return Rank
QQ.L
PYPL
QQ.L vs. PYPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QinetiQ Group plc (QQ.L) and PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQ.L | PYPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 0.79 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.17 | -0.85 | +0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.35 | -1.49 | +1.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQ.L vs. PYPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQ.L drawdown since its inception was -55.68%, smaller than the maximum PYPL drawdown of -87.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQ.L and PYPL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQ.L | PYPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.68% | -87.19% | +31.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.90% | -50.90% | +25.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.77% | -61.89% | +30.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.77% | -87.19% | +55.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.09% | -87.19% | +49.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.68% | -86.08% | +70.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.92% | -34.90% | +17.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.77% | 28.90% | -16.13% |
Volatility
QQ.L vs. PYPL - Volatility Comparison
QinetiQ Group plc (QQ.L) has a higher volatility of 11.18% compared to PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) at 6.29%. This indicates that QQ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQ.L | PYPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.18% | 6.29% | +4.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.10% | 31.69% | -9.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.81% | 38.90% | -8.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.21% | 41.05% | -9.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.88% | 38.47% | -9.59% |
Dividends
QQ.L vs. PYPL - Dividend Comparison
QQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, more than PYPL's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PYPL PayPal Holdings, Inc. | 1.01% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQ.L QinetiQ Group plc | 1.91% | 2.00% | 1.99% | 2.49% | 2.04% | 2.59% | 2.06% | 1.84% | 2.20% | 2.60% | 2.17% | 1.99% |
Financials
QQ.L vs. PYPL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between QinetiQ Group plc and PayPal Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
QQ.L vs. PYPL - Profitability Comparison
QQ.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QinetiQ Group plc reported a gross profit of 110.20M and revenue of 1.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.
PYPL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PayPal Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.81B and revenue of 8.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.6%.
QQ.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QinetiQ Group plc reported an operating income of 110.20M and revenue of 1.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.8%.
PYPL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PayPal Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.49B and revenue of 8.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.8%.
QQ.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QinetiQ Group plc reported a net income of 69.20M and revenue of 1.02B, resulting in a net margin of 6.8%.
PYPL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PayPal Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 1.11B and revenue of 8.35B, resulting in a net margin of 13.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
QQ.L and PYPL have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for QQ.L and PYPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer