PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQ.L vs. SRP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

QQ.L vs. SRP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in QinetiQ Group plc (QQ.L) and Serco Group (SRP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQ.L achieves a 7.09% return, which is significantly higher than SRP.L's -7.80% return. Over the past 10 years, QQ.L has underperformed SRP.L with an annualized return of 9.16%, while SRP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 9.83% annualized return.


QQ.L

1D
-0.63%
1M
6.33%
YTD
7.09%
6M
13.19%
1Y
-13.14%
3Y*
11.87%
5Y*
8.02%
10Y*
9.16%

SRP.L

1D
1.11%
1M
-7.68%
YTD
-7.80%
6M
-2.49%
1Y
36.31%
3Y*
23.35%
5Y*
15.82%
10Y*
9.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQ.L vs. SRP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QQ.L
QinetiQ Group plc
7.09%8.34%37.22%-11.50%37.15%-15.08%-8.68%27.80%27.13%-9.87%
SRP.L
Serco Group
-7.80%89.19%-4.75%6.45%17.32%14.45%-25.62%69.35%-3.34%-30.98%

Correlation

The correlation between QQ.L and SRP.L is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2006

0.29

Fundamentals

Market Cap

QQ.L:

£2.45B

SRP.L:

£2.66B

EPS

QQ.L:

-£0.14

SRP.L:

£0.18

PS Ratio

QQ.L:

0.66

SRP.L:

0.27

PB Ratio

QQ.L:

4.44

SRP.L:

3.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

QQ.L:

£3.85B

SRP.L:

£9.73B

Gross Profit (TTM)

QQ.L:

£372.10M

SRP.L:

£1.06B

EBITDA (TTM)

QQ.L:

£533.20M

SRP.L:

£513.60M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQ.L vs. SRP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQ.L
QQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
QQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
QQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

SRP.L
SRP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SRP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SRP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQ.L vs. SRP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QinetiQ Group plc (QQ.L) and Serco Group (SRP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQ.LSRP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.32

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.47

1.67

-2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.83

5.89

-6.72

QQ.L vs. SRP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQ.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is lower than the SRP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQ.L and SRP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQ.LSRP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.41

1.79

-2.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.69

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.33

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.30

-0.09

Drawdowns

QQ.L vs. SRP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQ.L drawdown since its inception was -55.68%, smaller than the maximum SRP.L drawdown of -88.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQ.L and SRP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQ.LSRP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.68%

-88.47%

+32.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.95%

-21.61%

-6.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.77%

-28.63%

-3.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.77%

-28.63%

-3.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.09%

-44.30%

+6.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.33%

-57.07%

+40.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.16%

-41.30%

+24.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.52%

6.14%

+7.38%

Volatility

QQ.L vs. SRP.L - Volatility Comparison

QinetiQ Group plc (QQ.L) has a higher volatility of 12.37% compared to Serco Group (SRP.L) at 6.16%. This indicates that QQ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQ.LSRP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.37%

6.16%

+6.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.28%

15.77%

+6.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.03%

20.21%

+11.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.20%

22.94%

+8.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.88%

29.40%

-0.52%

Dividends

QQ.L vs. SRP.L - Dividend Comparison

QQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than SRP.L's 1.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQ.L
QinetiQ Group plc
1.93%2.00%1.99%2.49%2.04%2.59%2.06%1.84%2.20%2.60%2.17%1.99%
SRP.L
Serco Group
1.77%1.53%2.39%1.89%1.64%1.63%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

QQ.L vs. SRP.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between QinetiQ Group plc and Serco Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
1.02B
2.49B
(QQ.L) Total Revenue
(SRP.L) Total Revenue
Values in GBp except per share items

QQ.L vs. SRP.L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between QinetiQ Group plc and Serco Group over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20222023202420252026
10.8%
10.6%
Portfolio components
QQ.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QinetiQ Group plc reported a gross profit of 110.20M and revenue of 1.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.

SRP.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Serco Group reported a gross profit of 262.80M and revenue of 2.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.6%.

QQ.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QinetiQ Group plc reported an operating income of 110.20M and revenue of 1.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.8%.

SRP.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Serco Group reported an operating income of 125.00M and revenue of 2.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.0%.

QQ.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, QinetiQ Group plc reported a net income of 69.20M and revenue of 1.02B, resulting in a net margin of 6.8%.

SRP.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Serco Group reported a net income of 57.00M and revenue of 2.49B, resulting in a net margin of 2.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


QQ.L and SRP.L have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQ.L and SRP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer