QPUX vs. FDL
QPUX (Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF) and FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - QPUX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while FDL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. QPUX is actively managed, while FDL is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. QPUX charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for FDL.
Performance
QPUX vs. FDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QPUX achieves a -71.23% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 17.61% return.
QPUX
- 1D
- -13.62%
- 1M
- -55.16%
- 6M
- -76.32%
- YTD
- -71.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDL
- 1D
- 2.42%
- 1M
- 2.96%
- 6M
- 12.71%
- YTD
- 17.61%
- 1Y
- 25.62%
- 3Y*
- 19.90%
- 5Y*
- 14.10%
- 10Y*
- 10.98%
QPUX vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QPUX Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF | -71.23% | -55.09% |
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 17.61% | 7.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between QPUX and FDL is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2025 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QPUX vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank
QPUX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FDL
QPUX vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF (QPUX) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QPUX | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.38 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 6.02 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.73 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QPUX vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QPUX drawdown since its inception was -94.73%, which is greater than FDL's maximum drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QPUX and FDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QPUX | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.73% | -65.93% | -28.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.29% | 0.00% | -94.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.47% | -9.61% | -60.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.87% | — |
Volatility
QPUX vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QPUX | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.91% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.74% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 198.75% | 11.79% | +186.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 198.75% | 14.41% | +184.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 198.75% | 17.13% | +181.62% |
QPUX vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
QPUX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
QPUX vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison
QPUX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 3.61% | 4.04% | 4.96% | 4.58% | 3.58% | 4.59% | 4.48% | 3.75% | 3.97% | 3.18% | 2.93% | 3.65% |
QPUX Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QPUX and FDL have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.43% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FDL is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for QPUX.
FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 0.00% for QPUX.
QPUX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for QPUX and 0.43% for FDL.
Find the right allocation for QPUX and FDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer