QOWZ vs. SPHD
QOWZ (Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF) and SPHD (Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QOWZ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq US Free Cash Flow Achievers Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SPHD is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QOWZ returned -0.52% vs 15.61% for SPHD. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QOWZ charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for SPHD.
Performance
QOWZ vs. SPHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QOWZ achieves a -2.07% return, which is significantly lower than SPHD's 13.60% return.
QOWZ
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 3.73%
- 6M
- -1.86%
- YTD
- -2.07%
- 1Y
- -0.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPHD
- 1D
- 2.11%
- 1M
- 4.57%
- 6M
- 10.03%
- YTD
- 13.60%
- 1Y
- 15.61%
- 3Y*
- 13.23%
- 5Y*
- 8.36%
- 10Y*
- 7.34%
QOWZ vs. SPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QOWZ Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF | -2.07% | 7.24% | 33.16% | 5.69% |
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | 13.60% | 3.41% | 18.08% | 3.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between QOWZ and SPHD is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2023 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QOWZ vs. SPHD — Risk / Return Rank
QOWZ
SPHD
QOWZ vs. SPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF (QOWZ) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QOWZ | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.23 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.03 | 2.14 | -2.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.07 | 5.24 | -5.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QOWZ vs. SPHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QOWZ drawdown since its inception was -20.36%, smaller than the maximum SPHD drawdown of -41.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QOWZ and SPHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QOWZ | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.36% | -41.39% | +21.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.81% | -7.33% | -10.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.80% | 0.00% | -5.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.18% | -4.67% | +0.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.33% | 2.98% | +4.35% |
Volatility
QOWZ vs. SPHD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF (QOWZ) is 4.02%, while Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) has a volatility of 4.95%. This indicates that QOWZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QOWZ | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.02% | 4.95% | -0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.50% | 8.93% | +3.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.52% | 11.80% | +3.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.12% | 14.23% | +4.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.12% | 17.65% | +1.47% |
QOWZ vs. SPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
QOWZ has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHD's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
QOWZ vs. SPHD - Dividend Comparison
QOWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than SPHD's 4.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QOWZ Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF | 0.25% | 0.28% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | 4.38% | 4.02% | 3.41% | 4.48% | 3.89% | 3.45% | 4.89% | 4.07% | 4.40% | 3.14% | 3.83% | 3.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QOWZ and SPHD have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPHD has higher volatility (4.95%) compared to QOWZ (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QOWZ dropped -20.36% vs SPHD's -41.39%.
On 1-year performance, SPHD leads with 15.61% vs -0.52% for QOWZ. On fees, SPHD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, QOWZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPHD has performed better with a 15.61% return vs -0.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for QOWZ.
SPHD has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 0.25% for QOWZ.
QOWZ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPHD is Dividend. QOWZ tracks Nasdaq US Free Cash Flow Achievers Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SPHD tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for QOWZ and 0.30% for SPHD.
SPHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QOWZ and SPHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer