QOWZ vs. SPHD
QOWZ (Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF) and SPHD (Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QOWZ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq US Free Cash Flow Achievers Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SPHD is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QOWZ returned -5.02% vs 14.03% for SPHD. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QOWZ charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for SPHD.
Performance
QOWZ vs. SPHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QOWZ achieves a -7.89% return, which is significantly lower than SPHD's 9.11% return.
QOWZ
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -2.96%
- YTD
- -7.89%
- 6M
- -9.21%
- 1Y
- -5.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPHD
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 2.12%
- YTD
- 9.11%
- 6M
- 8.71%
- 1Y
- 14.03%
- 3Y*
- 12.44%
- 5Y*
- 7.09%
- 10Y*
- 7.82%
QOWZ vs. SPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QOWZ Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF | -7.89% | 7.24% | 33.16% | 5.69% |
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | 9.11% | 3.41% | 18.08% | 3.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between QOWZ and SPHD is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2023 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QOWZ vs. SPHD — Risk / Return Rank
QOWZ
SPHD
QOWZ vs. SPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF (QOWZ) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QOWZ | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.21 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.28 | 1.92 | -2.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.71 | 4.71 | -5.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QOWZ vs. SPHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QOWZ drawdown since its inception was -20.36%, smaller than the maximum SPHD drawdown of -41.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QOWZ and SPHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QOWZ | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.36% | -41.39% | +21.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.81% | -7.33% | -10.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.40% | -1.08% | -10.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.11% | -4.69% | +0.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.10% | 2.98% | +4.12% |
Volatility
QOWZ vs. SPHD - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF (QOWZ) has a higher volatility of 6.20% compared to Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) at 4.28%. This indicates that QOWZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QOWZ | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.20% | 4.28% | +1.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.49% | 8.14% | +4.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.51% | 11.48% | +4.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.27% | 14.16% | +5.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.27% | 17.64% | +1.63% |
QOWZ vs. SPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
QOWZ has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHD's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
QOWZ vs. SPHD - Dividend Comparison
QOWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than SPHD's 4.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QOWZ Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF | 0.27% | 0.28% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | 4.56% | 4.02% | 3.41% | 4.48% | 3.89% | 3.45% | 4.89% | 4.07% | 4.40% | 3.14% | 3.83% | 3.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QOWZ and SPHD have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QOWZ has higher volatility (6.20%) compared to SPHD (4.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QOWZ dropped -20.36% vs SPHD's -41.39%.
On 1-year performance, SPHD leads with 14.03% vs -5.02% for QOWZ. On fees, SPHD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, SPHD has been the lower-risk option at 4.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPHD has performed better with a 14.03% return vs -5.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPHD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for QOWZ.
SPHD has the higher dividend yield at 4.56%, compared with 0.27% for QOWZ.
QOWZ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPHD is Dividend. QOWZ tracks Nasdaq US Free Cash Flow Achievers Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SPHD tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for QOWZ and 0.30% for SPHD.
SPHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QOWZ and SPHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer