QOWZ vs. ILCG
QOWZ (Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF) and ILCG (iShares Morningstar Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - QOWZ tracks the Nasdaq US Free Cash Flow Achievers Index - Benchmark TR Gross while ILCG tracks the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QOWZ returned 2.83% vs 29.51% for ILCG. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QOWZ charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for ILCG.
Performance
QOWZ vs. ILCG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QOWZ achieves a -1.71% return, which is significantly lower than ILCG's 14.48% return.
QOWZ
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- 6.39%
- YTD
- -1.71%
- 6M
- -1.76%
- 1Y
- 2.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ILCG
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 7.68%
- YTD
- 14.48%
- 6M
- 14.61%
- 1Y
- 29.51%
- 3Y*
- 26.55%
- 5Y*
- 14.95%
- 10Y*
- 18.15%
QOWZ vs. ILCG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QOWZ Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF | -1.71% | 7.24% | 33.16% | 6.47% |
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF | 14.48% | 16.71% | 32.82% | 4.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between QOWZ and ILCG is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2023 | 0.84 |
The correlation between QOWZ and ILCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
QOWZ vs. ILCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QOWZ
ILCG
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
QOWZ
ILCG
Industrials
QOWZ
ILCG
Healthcare
QOWZ
ILCG
Communication Services
QOWZ
ILCG
Financial Services
QOWZ
ILCG
Consumer Cyclical
QOWZ
ILCG
Consumer Defensive
QOWZ
ILCG
Basic Materials
QOWZ
-
ILCG
Energy
QOWZ
-
ILCG
Real Estate
QOWZ
-
ILCG
Utilities
QOWZ
-
ILCG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QOWZ vs. ILCG — Risk / Return Rank
QOWZ
ILCG
QOWZ vs. ILCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF (QOWZ) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QOWZ | ILCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.32 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 1.89 | -1.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.42 | 6.68 | -6.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QOWZ | ILCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 | 1.82 | -1.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.59 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
QOWZ vs. ILCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QOWZ drawdown since its inception was -20.36%, smaller than the maximum ILCG drawdown of -52.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QOWZ and ILCG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QOWZ | ILCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.36% | -52.98% | +32.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.81% | -15.65% | -2.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.46% | -1.02% | -4.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.98% | -8.22% | +4.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.70% | 4.43% | +2.27% |
Volatility
QOWZ vs. ILCG - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF (QOWZ) has a higher volatility of 5.04% compared to iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) at 4.40%. This indicates that QOWZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QOWZ | ILCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.04% | 4.40% | +0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.99% | 12.81% | -0.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.28% | 16.31% | -1.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.27% | 22.00% | -2.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.27% | 21.53% | -2.26% |
QOWZ vs. ILCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
QOWZ has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
QOWZ vs. ILCG - Dividend Comparison
QOWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than ILCG's 0.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF | 0.40% | 0.47% | 0.50% | 0.69% | 0.75% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 0.81% | 0.89% | 0.95% | 0.99% |
QOWZ Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF | 0.26% | 0.28% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QOWZ and ILCG have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QOWZ has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to ILCG (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QOWZ dropped -20.36% vs ILCG's -52.98%.
On 1-year performance, ILCG leads with 29.51% vs 2.83% for QOWZ. On fees, ILCG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ILCG has been the lower-risk option at 4.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ILCG has performed better with a 29.51% return vs 2.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ILCG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for QOWZ.
ILCG has the higher dividend yield at 0.40%, compared with 0.26% for QOWZ.
QOWZ tracks Nasdaq US Free Cash Flow Achievers Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while ILCG tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for QOWZ and 0.04% for ILCG.
ILCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QOWZ and ILCG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer