QNTG.L vs. ARMH

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QNTG.L) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH).

QNTG.L and ARMH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QNTG.L is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MarketVector Global Quantum Leaders Index. It was launched on May 21, 2025. ARMH is an actively managed fund by Precidian. It was launched on Mar 13, 2025.

Performance

QNTG.L vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QNTG.L) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QNTG.L vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QNTG.L VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc	-6.88%	18.84%
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	44.85%	-16.65%

Different Trading Currencies

QNTG.L is traded in GBp, while ARMH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ARMH values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QNTG.L achieves a -6.88% return, which is significantly lower than ARMH's 44.85% return.

QNTG.L

• 1D: 4.04%
• 1M: -6.13%
• YTD: -6.88%
• 6M: -7.90%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARMH

• 1D: 1.57%
• 1M: 26.45%
• YTD: 44.85%
• 6M: 6.57%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QNTG.L vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

QNTG.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

QNTG.L

VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc

ARMH

Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF

Return for Risk

QNTG.L vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QNTG.L) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QNTG.L	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.86	-0.40

Correlation

The correlation between QNTG.L and ARMH is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

QNTG.L vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison

QNTG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%.

	TTM	2025
QNTG.L VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc	0.00%	0.00%
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	2.37%	2.64%

Drawdowns

QNTG.L vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QNTG.L drawdown since its inception was -23.25%, smaller than the maximum ARMH drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QNTG.L and ARMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	QNTG.L	ARMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.25%	-42.04%	+18.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.84%	-12.19%	-7.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.95%	-16.31%	+8.36%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QNTG.L	ARMH	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.42%	51.32%	-23.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.42%	51.32%	-23.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.42%	51.32%	-23.90%