QMMY vs. KNG

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

QMMY (FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - May) and KNG (FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QMMY is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by First Trust, while KNG is a Dividend fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. QMMY is actively managed, while KNG is passively managed. Over the past year, QMMY returned 10.49% vs 12.58% for KNG. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QMMY charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for KNG.

Performance

QMMY vs. KNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - May (QMMY) and FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QMMY achieves a 4.28% return, which is significantly lower than KNG's 9.14% return.

QMMY

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: -0.93%
• 6M: 3.80%
• YTD: 4.28%
• 1Y: 10.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KNG

• 1D: 2.21%
• 1M: 2.96%
• 6M: 4.42%
• YTD: 9.14%
• 1Y: 12.58%
• 3Y*: 7.68%
• 5Y*: 6.03%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QMMY vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QMMY FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - May	4.28%	15.80%	8.37%
KNG FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF	9.14%	6.63%	0.47%

Correlation

The correlation between QMMY and KNG is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2024	0.27

The correlation between QMMY and KNG shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

QMMY vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QMMY

QMMY Risk / Return Rank: 61
QMMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
QMMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
QMMY Omega Ratio Rank: 55
QMMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
QMMY Martin Ratio Rank: 81

KNG

KNG Risk / Return Rank: 37
KNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
KNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
KNG Omega Ratio Rank: 36
KNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
KNG Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QMMY vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - May (QMMY) and FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QMMY	KNG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	1.18	+0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.00	1.82	+0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.21	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.76	1.47	+1.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.44	3.67	+8.77

QMMY vs. KNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QMMY Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the KNG Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QMMY and KNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QMMY vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMMY drawdown since its inception was -12.82%, smaller than the maximum KNG drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMMY and KNG.

Drawdown Indicators

	QMMY	KNG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.82%	-35.12%	+22.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.82%	-8.61%	+4.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.24%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.81%	-0.41%	-1.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.14%	-4.10%	+2.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.85%	3.43%	-2.58%

Volatility

QMMY vs. KNG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - May (QMMY) is 3.38%, while FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) has a volatility of 4.20%. This indicates that QMMY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QMMY	KNG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.38%	4.20%	-0.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.61%	8.16%	-1.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.61%	10.73%	-3.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.06%	13.64%	-2.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.06%	17.14%	-6.08%

QMMY vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QMMY has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than KNG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

QMMY vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison

QMMY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.17%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
KNG FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF	8.17%	8.61%	9.08%	5.91%	4.00%	3.45%	3.62%	4.09%	3.46%
QMMY FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - May	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QMMY and KNG in my portfolio?

QMMY and KNG have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QMMY or KNG?

KNG has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to QMMY (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QMMY dropped -12.82% vs KNG's -35.12%.

Which ETF is better, QMMY or KNG?

On 1-year performance, KNG leads with 12.58% vs 10.49% for QMMY. On fees, KNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, QMMY has been the lower-risk option at 3.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QMMY or KNG?

Over the 1-year period, KNG has performed better with a 12.58% return vs 10.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QMMY or KNG?

KNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for QMMY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QMMY or KNG?

KNG has the higher dividend yield at 8.17%, compared with 0.00% for QMMY.

What is the main difference between QMMY and KNG?

QMMY is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while KNG is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for QMMY and 0.75% for KNG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QMMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.