QMID vs. SQLV

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

QMID (WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund) and SQLV (Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF) are both Quality Factor funds. QMID is passively managed, while SQLV is actively managed. Over the past year, QMID returned 10.41% vs 37.64% for SQLV. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. QMID charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SQLV.

Performance

QMID vs. SQLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) and Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QMID achieves a 5.39% return, which is significantly lower than SQLV's 23.57% return.

QMID

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 0.96%
• 6M: 4.68%
• YTD: 5.39%
• 1Y: 10.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.76%

SQLV

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: 1.00%
• 6M: 18.55%
• YTD: 23.57%
• 1Y: 37.64%
• 3Y*: 12.11%
• 5Y*: 8.18%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
QMID WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund	$4.39K	$13.06K	$31.63K
SQLV Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF	$1.18M	$614.27K	$248.07K

QMID vs. SQLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QMID WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund	5.39%	5.02%	9.01%
SQLV Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF	23.57%	2.50%	7.79%

Correlation

The correlation between QMID and SQLV is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024	0.85

The correlation between QMID and SQLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

QMID vs. SQLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QMID	SQLV
Industrials	19.9%	10.3%
Consumer Cyclical	19.3%	13.8%
Healthcare	17.9%	18.7%
Technology	17.2%	15.9%
Financial Services	13.2%	19.0%
Communication Services	4.6%	6.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	7.4%
Energy	3.0%	4.0%
Basic Materials	0.6%	3.8%
Real Estate	-	0.9%
Utilities	-	0.2%

Return for Risk

QMID vs. SQLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QMID

QMID Risk / Return Rank: 26
QMID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
QMID Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
QMID Omega Ratio Rank: 23
QMID Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
QMID Martin Ratio Rank: 31

SQLV

SQLV Risk / Return Rank: 86
SQLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
SQLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
SQLV Omega Ratio Rank: 81
SQLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
SQLV Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QMID vs. SQLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) and Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QMID	SQLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.58	2.02	-1.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.95	2.97	-2.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.34	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.82	3.95	-3.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.77	12.39	-9.62

QMID vs. SQLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QMID Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is lower than the SQLV Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QMID and SQLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QMID vs. SQLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMID drawdown since its inception was -24.42%, smaller than the maximum SQLV drawdown of -48.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMID and SQLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	QMID	SQLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.42%	-48.34%	+23.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.67%	-8.84%	-1.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.86%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.86%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.34%	-1.74%	+0.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.22%	-8.80%	+3.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.15%	2.81%	+0.34%

Volatility

QMID vs. SQLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) is 3.78%, while Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV) has a volatility of 4.34%. This indicates that QMID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QMID	SQLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.78%	4.34%	-0.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.87%	11.60%	-0.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.17%	17.33%	-2.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.23%	20.87%	-2.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.23%	23.24%	-5.01%

QMID vs. SQLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

QMID has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than SQLV's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

QMID vs. SQLV - Dividend Comparison

QMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than SQLV's 0.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QMID WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund	0.49%	0.51%	1.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SQLV Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF	0.95%	1.15%	1.11%	1.09%	1.24%	1.12%	1.22%	1.20%	1.08%	0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QMID and SQLV in my portfolio?

QMID and SQLV have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QMID or SQLV?

SQLV has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to QMID (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QMID dropped -24.42% vs SQLV's -48.34%.

Which ETF is better, QMID or SQLV?

On 1-year performance, SQLV leads with 37.64% vs 10.41% for QMID. On fees, QMID is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, QMID has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QMID or SQLV?

Over the 1-year period, SQLV has performed better with a 37.64% return vs 10.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QMID or SQLV?

QMID is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SQLV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QMID or SQLV?

SQLV has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.49% for QMID.

What is the main difference between QMID and SQLV?

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for QMID and 0.60% for SQLV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SQLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.