QMID vs. JHMM

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

QMID (WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund) and JHMM (John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QMID is a Quality Factor fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Index, while JHMM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QMID returned 10.41% vs 21.81% for JHMM. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. QMID charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for JHMM.

Performance

QMID vs. JHMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) and John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QMID achieves a 5.39% return, which is significantly lower than JHMM's 13.54% return.

QMID

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 0.96%
• 6M: 4.68%
• YTD: 5.39%
• 1Y: 10.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.76%

JHMM

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: -0.44%
• 6M: 8.72%
• YTD: 13.54%
• 1Y: 21.81%
• 3Y*: 14.22%
• 5Y*: 8.30%
• 10Y*: 11.70%
• ALL TIME*: 12.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF	$16.53M	$15.46M	$17.20M
QMID WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund	$4.39K	$13.06K	$31.63K

QMID vs. JHMM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QMID WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund	5.39%	5.02%	9.01%
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF	13.54%	10.73%	16.28%

Correlation

The correlation between QMID and JHMM is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024	0.92

The correlation between QMID and JHMM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

QMID vs. JHMM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QMID	JHMM
Industrials	19.9%	16.4%
Consumer Cyclical	19.3%	8.3%
Healthcare	17.9%	8.5%
Technology	17.2%	18.1%
Financial Services	13.2%	20.1%
Communication Services	4.6%	1.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	6.1%
Energy	3.0%	1.8%
Basic Materials	0.6%	7.4%
Real Estate	-	8.1%
Utilities	-	3.7%

Return for Risk

QMID vs. JHMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QMID

QMID Risk / Return Rank: 26
QMID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
QMID Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
QMID Omega Ratio Rank: 23
QMID Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
QMID Martin Ratio Rank: 31

JHMM

JHMM Risk / Return Rank: 64
JHMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
JHMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
JHMM Omega Ratio Rank: 57
JHMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
JHMM Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QMID vs. JHMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) and John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QMID	JHMM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.58	1.41	-0.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.95	2.06	-1.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.25	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.82	2.34	-1.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.77	8.99	-6.22

QMID vs. JHMM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QMID Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is lower than the JHMM Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QMID and JHMM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QMID vs. JHMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMID drawdown since its inception was -24.42%, smaller than the maximum JHMM drawdown of -40.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMID and JHMM.

Drawdown Indicators

	QMID	JHMM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.42%	-40.71%	+16.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.67%	-8.64%	-2.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.88%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.10%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.71%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.34%	-1.20%	-0.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.22%	-5.37%	+0.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.15%	2.24%	+0.91%

Volatility

QMID vs. JHMM - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) has a higher volatility of 3.78% compared to John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) at 2.93%. This indicates that QMID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QMID	JHMM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.78%	2.93%	+0.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.87%	10.62%	+0.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.17%	14.33%	+0.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.23%	18.30%	-0.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.23%	19.54%	-1.31%

QMID vs. JHMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

QMID has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than JHMM's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

QMID vs. JHMM - Dividend Comparison

QMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than JHMM's 0.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF	0.89%	0.98%	1.01%	1.17%	1.16%	0.72%	1.04%	1.02%	1.36%	0.90%	1.15%	0.33%
QMID WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund	0.49%	0.51%	1.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QMID and JHMM in my portfolio?

QMID and JHMM have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QMID or JHMM?

QMID has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to JHMM (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QMID dropped -24.42% vs JHMM's -40.71%.

Which ETF is better, QMID or JHMM?

On 1-year performance, JHMM leads with 21.81% vs 10.41% for QMID. On fees, QMID is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, JHMM has been the lower-risk option at 2.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QMID or JHMM?

Over the 1-year period, JHMM has performed better with a 21.81% return vs 10.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QMID or JHMM?

QMID is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for JHMM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QMID or JHMM?

JHMM has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.49% for QMID.

What is the main difference between QMID and JHMM?

QMID is categorized as Quality Factor, while JHMM is Mid Cap Growth Equities. QMID tracks WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Index, while JHMM tracks John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Manulife. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for QMID and 0.42% for JHMM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JHMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.