QMHNX vs. TIBIX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

QMHNX (AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N) and TIBIX (Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I) are both mutual funds - QMHNX is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by AQR, while TIBIX is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Thornburg. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, QMHNX returned 5.40%/yr vs 12.65%/yr for TIBIX. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. QMHNX charges 4.12%/yr vs 0.93%/yr for TIBIX.

Performance

QMHNX vs. TIBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N (QMHNX) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QMHNX having a 16.75% return and TIBIX slightly higher at 17.20%. Over the past 10 years, QMHNX has underperformed TIBIX with an annualized return of 5.40%, while TIBIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.65% annualized return.

QMHNX

• 1D: 1.85%
• 1M: 1.14%
• YTD: 16.75%
• 6M: 19.58%
• 1Y: 32.62%
• 3Y*: 15.73%
• 5Y*: 15.74%
• 10Y*: 5.40%

TIBIX

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 1.98%
• YTD: 17.20%
• 6M: 21.00%
• 1Y: 39.22%
• 3Y*: 26.55%
• 5Y*: 16.27%
• 10Y*: 12.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QMHNX vs. TIBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QMHNX AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N	16.75%	19.65%	10.48%	-0.40%	49.64%	-2.30%	-0.85%	1.55%	-14.59%	-2.06%
TIBIX Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I	17.20%	37.01%	13.48%	18.28%	-7.69%	20.36%	-0.40%	18.01%	-4.31%	15.23%

Correlation

The correlation between QMHNX and TIBIX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.04
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.05
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014	-0.01

The correlation between QMHNX and TIBIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (5 years) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

QMHNX vs. TIBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QMHNX

QMHNX Risk / Return Rank: 82
QMHNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
QMHNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
QMHNX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
QMHNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
QMHNX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

TIBIX

TIBIX Risk / Return Rank: 98
TIBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
TIBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
TIBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
TIBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
TIBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QMHNX vs. TIBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N (QMHNX) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QMHNX	TIBIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.69	4.76	-2.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.47	6.84	-3.37
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.96	-0.50
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.13	7.48	-0.35
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	21.00	29.26	-8.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QMHNX vs. TIBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QMHNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is lower than the TIBIX Sharpe Ratio of 4.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QMHNX and TIBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QMHNX	TIBIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.69	4.76	-2.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92	1.47	-0.55
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35	0.94	-0.59
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.76	-0.40

Drawdowns

QMHNX vs. TIBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMHNX drawdown since its inception was -40.29%, smaller than the maximum TIBIX drawdown of -48.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMHNX and TIBIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QMHNX	TIBIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.29%	-48.88%	+8.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.81%	-5.39%	+0.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.23%	-9.23%	-10.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.23%	-20.79%	+1.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.34%	-34.85%	-0.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.78%	0.00%	-1.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.29%	-5.96%	-12.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.63%	1.38%	+0.25%

Volatility

QMHNX vs. TIBIX - Volatility Comparison

AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N (QMHNX) has a higher volatility of 3.61% compared to Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX) at 3.07%. This indicates that QMHNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QMHNX	TIBIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.61%	3.07%	+0.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.63%	6.98%	+2.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.73%	8.46%	+4.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.30%	11.16%	+6.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.47%	13.50%	+1.97%

QMHNX vs. TIBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QMHNX has a 4.12% expense ratio, which is higher than TIBIX's 0.93% expense ratio.

Dividends

QMHNX vs. TIBIX - Dividend Comparison

QMHNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, less than TIBIX's 5.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QMHNX AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N	1.62%	1.89%	2.09%	7.36%	8.75%	10.64%	7.79%	3.80%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	7.47%
TIBIX Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I	5.06%	5.83%	5.67%	4.89%	5.89%	5.33%	4.31%	4.46%	4.77%	4.52%	4.14%	4.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QMHNX and TIBIX in my portfolio?

QMHNX and TIBIX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QMHNX or TIBIX?

QMHNX has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to TIBIX (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QMHNX dropped -40.29% vs TIBIX's -48.88%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TIBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.76 vs 2.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.