PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QMHNX vs. QRPRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QMHNX vs. QRPRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N (QMHNX) and AQR Alternative Risk Premia R6 (QRPRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QMHNX achieves a 16.75% return, which is significantly lower than QRPRX's 19.20% return.


QMHNX

1D
1.85%
1M
1.14%
YTD
16.75%
6M
19.58%
1Y
32.62%
3Y*
15.73%
5Y*
15.74%
10Y*
5.40%

QRPRX

1D
1.73%
1M
4.44%
YTD
19.20%
6M
20.34%
1Y
36.24%
3Y*
23.88%
5Y*
19.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QMHNX vs. QRPRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
QMHNX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N
16.75%19.65%10.48%-0.40%49.64%-2.30%-0.85%1.55%-10.64%
QRPRX
AQR Alternative Risk Premia R6
19.20%23.57%18.88%7.30%25.46%14.33%-20.91%-2.94%-4.35%

Correlation

The correlation between QMHNX and QRPRX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2018

0.45

The correlation between QMHNX and QRPRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (all time) to 0.59 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QMHNX vs. QRPRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QMHNX
QMHNX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
QMHNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMHNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMHNX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
QMHNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMHNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

QRPRX
QRPRX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
QRPRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QRPRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
QRPRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
QRPRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
QRPRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QMHNX vs. QRPRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N (QMHNX) and AQR Alternative Risk Premia R6 (QRPRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QMHNXQRPRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.69

4.07

-1.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.47

5.91

-2.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.75

-0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

7.13

10.63

-3.50

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.00

31.09

-10.09

QMHNX vs. QRPRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QMHNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is lower than the QRPRX Sharpe Ratio of 4.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QMHNX and QRPRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QMHNXQRPRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.69

4.07

-1.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

1.69

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.86

-0.50

Drawdowns

QMHNX vs. QRPRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMHNX drawdown since its inception was -40.29%, which is greater than QRPRX's maximum drawdown of -28.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMHNX and QRPRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QMHNXQRPRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.29%

-28.21%

-12.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.81%

-3.46%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.23%

-11.24%

-7.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.23%

-11.24%

-7.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.78%

0.00%

-1.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.29%

-7.53%

-10.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

1.18%

+0.45%

Volatility

QMHNX vs. QRPRX - Volatility Comparison

AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N (QMHNX) has a higher volatility of 3.61% compared to AQR Alternative Risk Premia R6 (QRPRX) at 2.80%. This indicates that QMHNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QRPRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QMHNXQRPRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.61%

2.80%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.63%

6.75%

+2.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.73%

9.22%

+3.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.30%

11.83%

+5.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.47%

10.38%

+5.09%

QMHNX vs. QRPRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QMHNX has a 4.12% expense ratio, which is lower than QRPRX's 4.94% expense ratio.


Dividends

QMHNX vs. QRPRX - Dividend Comparison

QMHNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, more than QRPRX's 1.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QMHNX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N
1.62%1.89%2.09%7.36%8.75%10.64%7.79%3.80%0.00%0.00%0.01%7.47%
QRPRX
AQR Alternative Risk Premia R6
1.26%1.51%2.33%4.60%0.00%4.16%1.97%1.00%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QMHNX and QRPRX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QMHNX has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to QRPRX (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QMHNX dropped -40.29% vs QRPRX's -28.21%.

QRPRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.07 vs 2.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QMHNX and QRPRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer